Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 7 |
Program Evaluation | 3 |
Summative Evaluation | 3 |
Evaluation Problems | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Needs Assessment | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Theories | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Causal Models | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evaluation Practice | 2 |
Studies in Educational… | 2 |
American Journal of Evaluation | 1 |
Journal of MultiDisciplinary… | 1 |
New Directions for Program… | 1 |
Author
Scriven, Michael | 7 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
It is argued here that the general view, especially in the social sciences, of the specific status of evaluation is still deeply impregnated with completely absurd misrepresentations. A number of the worst are documented and refuted here, along with some suggestions as to their roots. It is stressed that the consequences of this tangled net of…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Misconceptions, Evaluation Methods, Social Sciences
Scriven, Michael – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008
This review focuses on what the author terms a reconsideration of the working credentials of the randomly controlled trial (RCT) design, and includes a discussion of popularly accepted aspects as well as some new perspectives. The author concludes that there is nothing either Imperative or superior about the need for RCT designs, and that an…
Descriptors: Credentials, Research Design, Summative Evaluation, Quasiexperimental Design

Scriven, Michael – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1995
The emergence of and relationship between two notions in personnel evaluation, merit and worth, are traced. How worth should be evaluated, and whether teacher evaluation is worth what it costs are discussed. Limitations of current approaches to teacher evaluation are reviewed, and the potential of a duties-based approach is noted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Integrated Activities, Models

Scriven, Michael – Evaluation Practice, 1996
The formative-summative distinction in evaluation is defended as a reasonable way to classify evaluation activities. Context ultimately defines the formative or summative functions of evaluation. The characteristics of an evaluator are defined, and points of agreement with the other contributors to the forum are noted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Context Effect, Definitions, Evaluation Methods

Scriven, Michael – Evaluation Practice, 1994
General remarks about the field of product evaluation are followed by comments on leading practitioners such as Consumers Union, road testers, and company product evaluators. The overall situation is one of seriously flawed evaluation methodology, although the best are very useful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Consumer Economics, Consumer Education, Consumer Protection, Economic Impact

Scriven, Michael – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1994
This essay provides some background on, explanation of, and justification of a theoretical framework for all types of evaluation. This framework is used to connect and underpin the approaches of other contributors to this special issue. A core discipline of evaluation is proposed that ties assorted evaluation fields together. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems

Scriven, Michael – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
Seven chapters present 31 propositions challenging traditional ideas about the nature and practice of program evaluation. Methods to improve evaluation models and approaches and ways to address intermediate and advanced evaluation issues are explored. The discussion also serves as an introduction to the most analytical and comprehensive of the…
Descriptors: Bias, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization