Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Discourse Analysis | 2 |
| Freedom of Speech | 2 |
| Audience Analysis | 1 |
| Censorship | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| Critical Theory | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Extracurricular Activities | 1 |
| Freedom of Information | 1 |
| Gender Issues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of School Leadership | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 2 |
| Bethel School District 403 v… | 1 |
| Hazelwood School District v… | 1 |
| Tinker v Des Moines… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEhrensal, Patricia A. L. – Journal of School Leadership, 2012
Student speech has and continues to be a contested issue in schools. The Supreme Court ruled in "Tinker" that students do not shed their rights at the schoolhouse gate; in the "Kuhlmeier" and "Fraser" decisions, however, the Court gave school officials greater latitude in regulating student speech, especially when it…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Freedom of Speech, Student Rights, Court Litigation
Download full textLipschultz, Jeremy Harris – 1988
The United States Supreme Court case, Meese v. Keene, in which the justices narrowly defined the meaning of the term "political propaganda," failed to address adequately the complexities of the issue. In this case it is necessary to bring together divergent views about communications in the analysis of the legal problem, including…
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Censorship, Court Litigation, Court Role
