Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Beliefs | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Deception | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Religious Factors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Romania | 1 |
| Slovakia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCavojová, Vladimíra; Secara, Eugen-Calin; Jurkovic, Marek; Šrol, Jakub – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2019
Propensity to judge randomly generated, syntactically correct (i.e., bullshit) statements as profound is associated with a variety of conceptually relevant variables (e.g., intuitive cognitive style and supernatural beliefs). Besides generalizing these findings to a different cultural setting, we examined the relationships to sharing the bullshit…
Descriptors: Syntax, Accuracy, Identification, Deception
