NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ward-Horner, John C.; Pittenger, Alexis; Pace, Gary; Fienup, Daniel M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2014
When the overall magnitude of reinforcement is matched between 2 alternative work schedules, some students prefer to complete all of their work for continuous access to a reinforcer (continuous work) rather than distributed access to a reinforcer while they work (discontinuous work). We evaluated a student's preference for continuous work by…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Student Attitudes, Preferences
Glover, Ashley C.; Roane, Henry S.; Kadey, Heather J.; Grow, Laura L. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2008
Progressive-ratio (PR) schedules were used to identify the break point (i.e., the last schedule value completed) for 2 reinforcers under single and concurrent schedules. After the respective break points were established, the same reinforcers were presented under concurrent fixed-ratio (FR) schedules that were yoked to the break points obtained…
Descriptors: Positive Reinforcement, Responses, Stimuli, Scheduling
Tiger, Jeffrey H.; Hanley, Gregory P.; Heal, Nicole A. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2006
Multiple schedules of reinforcement have been used to teach children to recruit attention only when it is available, thereby minimizing disruptive requesting during instructional activities. This procedure involves alternating periods of continuous reinforcement (CRF) with periods of extinction and correlating each period with a distinct and…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Preschool Children, Student Attitudes