Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 12 |
Descriptor
Source
Multivariate Behavioral… | 67 |
Author
Algina, James | 3 |
Keselman, H. J. | 2 |
Timm, Neil H. | 2 |
Velicer, Wayne F. | 2 |
Wilcox, Rand R. | 2 |
ten Berge, Jos M. F. | 2 |
Anderson, Lance E. | 1 |
Anthony, James C. | 1 |
Austin, Peter C. | 1 |
Bacik, Jennifer M. | 1 |
Bacon, Donald R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 67 |
Reports - Evaluative | 67 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Historical Materials | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Germany | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Eysenck Personality Inventory | 1 |
Minnesota Multiphasic… | 1 |
NEO Personality Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sass, Daniel A.; Schmitt, Thomas A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a commonly used statistical technique for examining the relationships between variables (e.g., items) and the factors (e.g., latent traits) they depict. There are several decisions that must be made when using EFA, with one of the more important being choice of the rotation criterion. This selection can be…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Criteria, Factor Structure, Correlation
Austin, Peter C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Researchers are increasingly using observational or nonrandomized data to estimate causal treatment effects. Essential to the production of high-quality evidence is the ability to reduce or minimize the confounding that frequently occurs in observational studies. When using the potential outcome framework to define causal treatment effects, one…
Descriptors: Computation, Regression (Statistics), Statistical Bias, Error of Measurement
Ruscio, John; Kaczetow, Walter – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
Interest in modeling the structure of latent variables is gaining momentum, and many simulation studies suggest that taxometric analysis can validly assess the relative fit of categorical and dimensional models. The generation and parallel analysis of categorical and dimensional comparison data sets reduces the subjectivity required to interpret…
Descriptors: Classification, Models, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Cafri, Guy; Kromrey, Jeffrey D.; Brannick, Michael T. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010
This article uses meta-analyses published in "Psychological Bulletin" from 1995 to 2005 to describe meta-analyses in psychology, including examination of statistical power, Type I errors resulting from multiple comparisons, and model choice. Retrospective power estimates indicated that univariate categorical and continuous moderators, individual…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Effect Size, Sampling, Psychology
Vallejo, G.; Fernandez, M. P.; Livacic-Rojas, P. E.; Tuero-Herrero, E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
Missing data are a pervasive problem in many psychological applications in the real world. In this article we study the impact of dropout on the operational characteristics of several approaches that can be easily implemented with commercially available software. These approaches include the covariance pattern model based on an unstructured…
Descriptors: Personality Problems, Psychosis, Prevention, Patients
Stadnytska, Tetiana; Braun, Simone; Werner, Joachim – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2008
This article evaluates the Smallest Canonical Correlation Method (SCAN) and the Extended Sample Autocorrelation Function (ESACF), automated methods for the Autoregressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA) model selection commonly available in current versions of SAS for Windows, as identification tools for integrated processes. SCAN and ESACF can…
Descriptors: Models, Identification, Multivariate Analysis, Correlation
Cook, Thomas D.; Steiner, Peter M.; Pohl, Steffi – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
This study uses within-study comparisons to assess the relative importance of covariate choice, unreliability in the measurement of these covariates, and whether regression or various forms of propensity score analysis are used to analyze the outcome data. Two of the within-study comparisons are of the four-arm type, and many more are of the…
Descriptors: Statistical Bias, Reliability, Data Analysis, Regression (Statistics)
Woods, Carol M. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test or questionnaire has different measurement properties for 1 group of people versus another, irrespective of mean differences on the construct. This study focuses on the use of multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) structural equation models for DIF testing, parameterized as item…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Structural Equation Models, Item Response Theory, Testing
Wang, Lijuan; Zhang, Zhiyong; McArdle, John J.; Salthouse, Timothy A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2008
Score limitation at the top of a scale is commonly termed "ceiling effect." Ceiling effects can lead to serious artifactual parameter estimates in most data analysis. This study examines the consequences of ceiling effects in longitudinal data analysis and investigates several methods of dealing with ceiling effects through Monte Carlo simulations…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Monte Carlo Methods
Culpepper, Steven Andrew – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
This study linked nonlinear profile analysis (NPA) of dichotomous responses with an existing family of item response theory models and generalized latent variable models (GLVM). The NPA method offers several benefits over previous internal profile analysis methods: (a) NPA is estimated with maximum likelihood in a GLVM framework rather than…
Descriptors: Profiles, Item Response Theory, Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics

Algina, James – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1999
Compared four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the squared multiple correlation coefficient. Results show that each of the three approximate methods (based on I. Olkin and J. Finn, 1995) work poorly for some combinations of "p" squared. Recommends the method based on R. Fisher's (1928) distribution. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation
van Ginkel, Joost R.; van der Ark, L. Andries; Sijtsma, Klaas – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
The performance of five simple multiple imputation methods for dealing with missing data were compared. In addition, random imputation and multivariate normal imputation were used as lower and upper benchmark, respectively. Test data were simulated and item scores were deleted such that they were either missing completely at random, missing at…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Psychometrics, Item Response Theory, Scores

Wilcox, Rand R.; Keselman, H. J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001
Compared two bootstrap methods that use trimmed means, the percentile and percentile T methods and considered how these methods might be adapted to comparing "K" measures corresponding to two independent groups. Results from simulation studies lead to an extension of the percentile bootstrap approach that gives better results. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Groups, Simulation
Chen, Fang Fang; West, Stephen G.; Sousa, Karen H. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
Bifactor and second-order factor models are two alternative approaches for representing general constructs comprised of several highly related domains. Bifactor and second-order models were compared using a quality of life data set (N = 403). The bifactor model identified three, rather than the hypothesized four, domain specific factors beyond the…
Descriptors: Quality of Life, Models, Sample Size, Factor Analysis

Little, Todd D. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1997
Practical and theoretical issues are discussed for testing the comparability, or measurement equivalence, of psychological constructs and detecting possible sociocultural differences on the constructs in cross-cultural research designs. Issues are explicated in the framework of multiple-group mean and covariance structure analyses. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Sociocultural Patterns