NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Source
New Directions for Evaluation3
Publication Type
Journal Articles3
Reports - Evaluative3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hall, Jori N. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
Mixed methods evaluation has a long-standing history of enhancing the credibility of evaluation findings. However, using mixed methods in a utilitarian way implicitly emphasizes convenience over engaging with its philosophical underpinnings (Denscombe, 2008). Because of this, some mixed methods evaluators and social science researchers have been…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation Methods, Pragmatics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnson, R. Burke; Stefurak, Tres – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
Credibility of evidence in evaluation is examined through the lens of dialectical pluralism (DP). Principles of procedural justice are a core element of DP and help justify outcomes of its application. A key message is that DP and the associated circle of scientific evidence and knowledge model can aid the evaluation community in producing an…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Credibility, Justice, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mertens, Donna M. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
Credibility in evaluation is a multifaceted concept that involves consideration of diverse stakeholders' perspectives and purposes. The use of a transformative lens is proposed as a means to bringing issues of social justice and human rights to the foreground in decisions about methodology, credibility of evidence, and use of evaluation…
Descriptors: Credibility, Stakeholders, Transformative Learning, Civil Rights