Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Ability | 40 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 40 |
Adaptive Testing | 37 |
Test Items | 24 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 23 |
Simulation | 16 |
Item Response Theory | 15 |
Test Construction | 13 |
Selection | 10 |
Item Banks | 9 |
Bayesian Statistics | 8 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 3 |
Journal of Educational and… | 3 |
Psychometrika | 3 |
Applied Measurement in… | 2 |
Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 40 |
Journal Articles | 15 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 14 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
COMPASS (Computer Assisted… | 1 |
Law School Admission Test | 1 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schmitt, T. A.; Sass, D. A.; Sullivan, J. R.; Walker, C. M. – International Journal of Testing, 2010
Imposed time limits on computer adaptive tests (CATs) can result in examinees having difficulty completing all items, thus compromising the validity and reliability of ability estimates. In this study, the effects of speededness were explored in a simulated CAT environment by varying examinee response patterns to end-of-test items. Expectedly,…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Simulation, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing

Cheng, Philip E.; Liou, Michelle – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2000
Reviewed methods of estimating theta suitable for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and discussed the differences between Fisher and Kullback-Leibler information criteria for selecting items. Examined the accuracy of different CAT algorithms using samples from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Results show when correcting for…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Stocking, Martha L.; Lewis, Charles – 1995
The interest in the application of large-scale adaptive testing for secure tests has served to focus attention on issues that arise when theoretical advances are made operational. Many such issues in the application of large-scale adaptive testing for secure tests have more to do with changes in testing conditions than with testing paradigms. One…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing

Bradlow, Eric T. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
The three-parameter logistic (3-PL) model is described and a derivation of the 3-PL observed information function is presented for a single binary response from one examinee with known item parameters. Formulas are presented for the probability of negative information and for the expected information (always nonnegative). (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory

van der Linden, Wim J.; Glas, Cees A. W. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2000
Performed a simulation study to demonstrate the dramatic impact of capitalization on estimation errors on ability estimation in adaptive testing. Discusses four different strategies to minimize the likelihood of capitalization in computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)

van der Linden, Wim J. – Psychometrika, 1998
This paper suggests several item selection criteria for adaptive testing that are all based on the use of the true posterior. Some of the ability estimators produced by these criteria are discussed and empirically criticized. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing

Walker, Cindy M.; Beretvas, S. Natasha; Ackerman, Terry – Applied Measurement in Education, 2001
Conducted a simulation study of differential item functioning (DIF) to compare the power and Type I error rates for two conditions: using an examinee's ability estimate as the conditioning variable with the CATSIB program and either using the regression correction from CATSIB or not. Discusses implications of findings for DIF detection. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Bias
Ackerman, Terry A.; Davey, Tim C. – 1991
An adaptive test can usually match or exceed the measurement precision of conventional tests several times its length. This increased efficiency is not without costs, however, as the models underlying adaptive testing make strong assumptions about examinees and items. Most troublesome is the assumption that item pools are unidimensional. Truly…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Equations (Mathematics)
van der Linden, Wim J. – 1997
In constrained adaptive testing, the numbers of constraints needed to control the content of the tests can easily run into the hundreds. Proper initialization of the algorithm becomes a requirement because the presence of large numbers of constraints slows down the convergence of the ability estimator. In this paper, an empirical initialization of…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
van der Linden, Wim J. – 1997
The case of adaptive testing under a multidimensional logistic response model is addressed. An adaptive algorithm is proposed that minimizes the (asymptotic) variance of the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator of a linear combination of abilities of interest. The item selection criterion is a simple expression in closed form. In addition, it is…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Zhu, Daming; Fan, Meichu – 1999
The convention for selecting starting points (that is, initial items) on a computerized adaptive test (CAT) is to choose as starting points items of medium difficulty for all examinees. Selecting a starting point based on prior information about an individual's ability was first suggested many years ago, but has been believed unimportant provided…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level

Wang, Tianyou; Vispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Used simulations of computerized adaptive tests to evaluate results yielded by four commonly used ability estimation methods: maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and three Bayesian approaches. Results show clear distinctions between MLE and Bayesian methods. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing

Zwick, Rebecca; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1995
In a simulation study of ability and estimation of differential item functioning (DIF) in computerized adaptive tests, Rasch-based DIF statistics were highly correlated with generating DIF, but DIF statistics tended to be slightly smaller than in the three-parameter logistic model analyses. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Tang, K. Linda – 1996
The average Kullback-Keibler (K-L) information index (H. Chang and Z. Ying, in press) is a newly proposed statistic in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) item selection based on the global information function. The objectives of this study were to improve understanding of the K-L index with various parameters and to compare the performance of the…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Parshall, Cynthia G.; Davey, Tim; Nering, Mike L. – 1998
When items are selected during a computerized adaptive test (CAT) solely with regard to their measurement properties, it is commonly found that certain items are administered to nearly every examinee, and that a small number of the available items will account for a large proportion of the item administrations. This presents a clear security risk…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Efficiency