Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Business Communication | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Design | 1 |
| Dialogs (Language) | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Dialogic Pedagogy | 1 |
Author
| Pilcher, Nick | 1 |
| Richards, Kendall | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| China | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
An Individual Subjectivist Critique of the Use of Corpus Linguistics to Inform Pedagogical Materials
Peer reviewed
Download full textRichards, Kendall; Pilcher, Nick – Dialogic Pedagogy, 2016
Corpus linguistics, or the gathering together of language into a body for analysis and development of materials, is claimed to be an assured, established method (or field) that valuably informs pedagogical materials and knowledge of language (e.g. Ädel 2010; Gardner & Nesi, 2013). The fundamental validity of corpus linguistics is rarely, if…
Descriptors: Criticism, Computational Linguistics, Instructional Materials, Interviews
