Descriptor
Cutting Scores | 2 |
Educational Testing | 2 |
Pass Fail Grading | 2 |
Classification | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
Judges | 1 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
Sample Size | 1 |
Sampling | 1 |
Scoring | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Assessment | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Dwyer, Carol Anne – Psychological Assessment, 1996
The uses and abuses of cut scores are examined. The article demonstrates (1) that cut scores always entail judgment; (2) that cut scores inherently result in misclassification; (3) that cut scores impose an artificial dichotomy on an essentially continuous distribution of knowledge, skill, or ability; and (4) that no true cut scores exist. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Cutting Scores, Educational Testing, Error of Measurement
Cizek, Gregory J.; Husband, Timothy H. – 1997
The contrasting groups method is one of many possible methods for setting passing scores. The most commonly used method is probably that developed by W. H. Angoff (1971), but it has been suggested that the Angoff method may not be appropriate for many standard setting applications in education. The contrasting groups method is explored as an…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Educational Research, Educational Testing, Judges