Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 23 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 29 |
Journal Articles | 27 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jayne E. O. Stone – Composition Forum, 2024
In this article, I argue for centralizing revision in FYC classrooms, thereby establishing it as the vital component of composition that it is. I show that engagement with revision in FYC courses tends to be minimal, relegated to the end of a project, or completely omitted. These low standards for revision pedagogy can result in students not…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Faculty, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Duffy, W. Keith – Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 2023
This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, Teacher Student Relationship
Godwin-Jones, Robert – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to significantly improved, or in some cases, completely new digital tools for writing. Systems for writing assessment and assistance based on automated writing evaluation (AWE) have been available for some time. That is the case for machine translation as well. More recent are…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation
Michael McGuire – Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2019
The concept of data-driven learning (DDL) -- direct student use of corpora -- has been gaining attention among researchers and teachers. DDL gives learners the chance to take an inductive approach to learning by recognizing patterns in corpus data rather than following abstract rules. However, very few studies focus on presenting clear practices…
Descriptors: Japanese, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Woodworth, Johanathan; Barkaoui, Khaled – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
While feedback is widely considered essential for second language (L2) writing development (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012), teachers may not always be able to provide their learners with immediate and frequent corrective feedback. Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems can help respond to this challenge by providing L2 learners with written…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Second Language Instruction
Shao, Xu – English Language Teaching, 2015
Truscott (1996) questions the practicability of grammar correction, and he believes that written corrective feedback (WCF) is not only a waste of time, but even harmful to the students as well. This has led to a great deal of discussion and research on WCF in second-language (L2) writing. Ferris (1999) is the representative opponent of Truscott's…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Writing (Composition)
Saadat, Mahboobeh; Mehrpour, Saeed; Khajavi, Yaser – TESOL Journal, 2016
In this article, the authors examine different ways of using the Internet to receive feedback, and discuss advantages of language learners' use of the Internet to improve their own writing. In effect, the article elaborates on how Internet-mediated corrective feedback (IMCF) can be used as an efficient tool by language learners to become competent…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Panahi, Parva; Birjandi, Parviz; Azabdaftari, Behrooz – Language Testing in Asia, 2013
Feedback is a key component of teaching second language writing. As the field of second language writing instruction has recently placed greater emphasis on sociocultural considerations, issues related to the nature, negotiation, and delivery of feedback need to be re-examined. The present paper sought to provide a sociocultural basis for such a…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods
Sivell, John – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2013
At first glance it is surprising that--in remarkable contrast to grammatical or lexical failings which, while certainly not viewed as insignificant, are rarely greeted with outright anger or hostility--inappropriate documentation of scholarly sources so frequently provokes very harsh penalties. Rather than the constructively pedagogical approach…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Academic Discourse, Citations (References), Documentation
Nancy Frey; Douglas Fisher – English Journal, 2013
The authors assert that the time that teachers spend providing feedback could better be used to focus on formative assessment systems.
Descriptors: High School Teachers, English Teachers, Language Arts, Writing Instruction
Storch, Neomy – International Journal of English Studies, 2010
Recently we have witnessed a large growth in research on written corrective feedback (WCF). However, the question posed here is: are researchers and L2 writing teachers now any wiser about the efficacy of WCF? I begin with a summary of early studies and some of their major shortcomings. I then examine more recent studies and conclude that,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Writing Teachers, Writing Instruction
Yang, Yu-Fen – Educational Technology & Society, 2010
This study investigates how college students solve their cognitive conflicts when receiving peers' suggestions and corrections in online text revision. A sample of 45 undergraduate students were recruited to read their peer writers' texts, edit peer writers' errors, evaluate peer editors' corrections and suggestions, and finally rewrite their own…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Metalinguistics, Grammar, Prior Learning
Lee, Icy – Canadian Modern Language Review, 2011
Although second language (L2) teachers spend a significant amount of time marking students' writing, many of them feel that their efforts do not pay off. While students want teachers to give them feedback on their writing and value teacher feedback, they might experience feelings of frustration and confusion once they receive it. What is amiss in…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Teacher Attitudes, Foreign Countries, Writing Instruction
Lu, Tuanhua – International Education Studies, 2010
This paper analyzed the common errors in university students' writing. At the same time, it showed some methods based on activities designed to give students practice in these problem areas. The activities are meant to be carried out in a comfortable, non-threatening atmosphere in which students can make positive steps toward reducing their errors…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Writing (Composition), Error Correction
Armstrong, Christine L. – Ontario Action Researcher, 2011
This study investigates the use of writing portfolios in improving the accuracy of French immersion students' written French. It emerged from regularly observed notable and repeated errors in many of the author's students' writing (entitled fossilized errors due their resistance to correction). This study reaffirms that students of French…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), French, Immersion Programs, Second Language Instruction
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2