Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Akdere, Mesut | 1 |
Barber, Patti | 1 |
Barden, Sejal M. | 1 |
Blundo-Canto, Genowefa | 1 |
Canavan, John | 1 |
Deutsch, Nancy L. | 1 |
Devaux-Spatarakis, Agathe | 1 |
Dolan, Pat | 1 |
Faure, Guy | 1 |
Fives, Allyn | 1 |
Hainzelin, Etienne | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Reports - Evaluative | 11 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 2 |
Florida | 1 |
France | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Akdere, Mesut; Jiang, Yeling; Lobo, Flavio Destri – European Journal of Training and Development, 2022
Purpose: As new technologies such as immersive and augmented platforms emerge, training approaches are also transforming. The virtual reality (VR) platform provides a completely immersive learning experience for simulated training. Despite increased prevalence of these technologies, the extent literature is lagging behind in terms of evaluating…
Descriptors: Training, Computer Simulation, Educational Technology, Program Evaluation
O'Neill, Megan – Journal of Faculty Development, 2019
In response to existing anecdotal evidence on faculty development in first-year experience program, this paper provides both a model and an adaptable heuristic for using assessment data to shape faculty development. The author argues that using a mixed method methods approach to assess FYE students' critical thinking provided unique data on…
Descriptors: First Year Seminars, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Formative Evaluation
Shannonhouse, Laura R.; Barden, Sejal M.; McDonald, C. Peeper – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 2017
Mixed methods research (MMR) is a useful paradigm for group work as it allows exploration of both participant outcomes and "how" or "why" such changes occur. Unfortunately, the group counseling literature is not replete with MMR studies. This article reviews the application of MMR to group contexts and summarizes the corpus of…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Group Counseling, Group Therapy, Group Experience
Deutsch, Nancy L. – Journal of Character Education, 2017
In this article, I respond to Noel Card's "Methodological Issues in Measuring the Development of Character." I focus on the ways in which social scientific knowledge represents human constructions of the world and the implications of this stance for the measurement of character. Further, I consider how context influences those…
Descriptors: Moral Development, Values Education, Measurement, Educational Research
Faure, Guy; Blundo-Canto, Genowefa; Devaux-Spatarakis, Agathe; Le Guerroué, Jean Louis; Mathé, Syndhia; Temple, Ludovic; Toillier, Aurélie; Triomphe, Bernard; Hainzelin, Etienne – Research Evaluation, 2020
Over the last decade, societal pressure has increased on public research agencies to provide evidence that their research contributes to achieve development goals. To address this challenge, the French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (Cirad), developed an ex-post impact assessment method based on the impact pathway…
Descriptors: Social Change, Developing Nations, Agriculture, Research Projects
Fives, Allyn; Canavan, John; Dolan, Pat – European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2017
There is significant controversy over what counts as evidence in the evaluation of social interventions. It is increasingly common to use methodological criteria to rank evidence types in a hierarchy, with Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) at or near the highest level. Because of numerous challenges to a hierarchical approach, this article…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Ethics
He, Ye; Hutson, Bryant – Review of Higher Education, 2016
Academic advising is one of the key functions in higher education. While there has been a development of advising practices in the past decade, the assessment of academic advising practices is far from satisfactory. In this article, we review major academic advising approaches and key characteristics of quality assessment practices. Based on the…
Descriptors: Academic Advising, Higher Education, Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation Methods
Hall, Jori N. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2013
Mixed methods evaluation has a long-standing history of enhancing the credibility of evaluation findings. However, using mixed methods in a utilitarian way implicitly emphasizes convenience over engaging with its philosophical underpinnings (Denscombe, 2008). Because of this, some mixed methods evaluators and social science researchers have been…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation Methods, Pragmatics
Houssart, Jenny; Barber, Patti – Education 3-13, 2014
This article considers various approaches to consulting primary pupils about mathematics. This is done first through a literature review and second by drawing on our experience of designing and piloting pupil consultation in collaboration with staff in one primary school. Our concern is with the utility and drawbacks of the methods used rather…
Descriptors: Elementary School Mathematics, Elementary School Students, Literature Reviews, Consultation Programs
Oriel, Jennifer – Australian Universities' Review, 2011
Government policies designed to redress social inequality are often evaluated by qualitative methods, which prevents the establishment of a causal relationship between policy objectives and outcomes. Social programmes to broaden participation in higher education have been a feature of government policy in Europe, the US and Australia during the…
Descriptors: Evidence, Higher Education, Qualitative Research, Evaluation Research
Haynes, Abby – Australian Library Journal, 2004
This paper explores library evaluation in Australia and proposes a return to research fundamentals in which evaluators are asked to consider the centrality of philosophical issues and the role of different research methods. A critique of current evaluation examples demonstrates a system-centred, quantitative, input/output focus which fails to…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Library Services, Foreign Countries, Evaluators