NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pitt, Penelope – Australian Educational Researcher, 2014
This article reflects on a university human research ethics committee's unease regarding a feminist visual pilot study within the field of education. The small exploratory study proposed to explore a migrant mother's production of her son's identity through her family photograph collection. The committee requested substantial…
Descriptors: Ethics, Committees, Educational Research, Feminism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Danielson, Charlotte – Educational Leadership, 2011
Traditional systems of teacher evaluation are often ineffective because they rely on outmoded evaluative criteria, usually in the form of checklists; simplistic assessments, such as "needs improvement"; procedures that fail to differentiate between new and veteran teachers' experience and expertise; lack of consistency among evaluators;…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Evaluators, Teacher Evaluation, Pilot Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hammond, Angela; Westhues, Anne; Hanbidge, Alice Schmidt – Journal of Primary Prevention, 2009
The purpose of this study was to determine whether children who participated in a booster program 3 years after completing an emotion regulation program show a greater increase between pretest and post-test in the development of emotion regulation skills than children in a comparison group. A booster program was implemented as a pilot project with…
Descriptors: Cues, Evaluators, Pilot Projects, Pretests Posttests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crisp, Victoria; Novakovic, Nadezda – Evaluation & Research in Education, 2009
Maintaining standards over time is a much debated topic in the context of national examinations in the UK. This study used a pilot method to compare the demands, over time, of two examination units testing administration. The method involved 15 experts revising a framework of demand types and making paired comparisons of examinations from…
Descriptors: Pilot Projects, Test Reliability, Difficulty Level, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaghed, Nabeel; Dezaye, Ahmed – Quality in Higher Education, 2009
This paper reports on two different strategies that have been implemented in Iraq to improve quality assurance in the higher education sector in Iraq. One strategy has been developed by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Baghdad. It involved conducting a pilot study at the University of Babylon. This pilot included…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Scientific Research, Quality Control, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2007
Ethical problems encountered by foundation officers in their evaluation-related work were identified via an email survey of a sample of Council on Foundations member organizations. Of the respondents who had worked with evaluators, one-third indicated that they had faced ethical challenges. Most challenges fell into one of four categories:…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Conflict of Interest, Ethics, Pilot Projects
Roberts, Sharon Pol; Teddlie, Charles – 1993
The Louisiana Intern Teacher Assessment Program, part of the Louisiana Teacher Appraisal System, began with a preliminary field test, followed by a pilot test and implementation in 1993-94. Evaluation of the preliminary field test was conducted through responses of 223 assessors, intern teachers, principals, and assessor trainers to nine different…
Descriptors: Beginning Teacher Induction, Beginning Teachers, Elementary School Teachers, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reiter, Harold I.; Rosenfeld, Jack; Nandagopal, Kiruthiga; Eva, Kevin W. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2004
Context: Various research studies have examined the question of whether expert or non-expert raters, faculty or students, evaluators or standardized patients, give more reliable and valid summative assessments of performance on Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Less studied has been the question of whether or not non-faculty…
Descriptors: Evidence, Video Technology, Feedback (Response), Evaluators