Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Author
| Brown, Norrie | 1 |
| Cairncross, Sandra | 1 |
| Earl, Shirley | 1 |
| Goldfinch, Judy | 1 |
| Gray, Morag | 1 |
| Grayson, David | 1 |
| Huxham, Mark | 1 |
| Laybourn, Phyllis | 1 |
| Marsh, Herbert W. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHuxham, Mark; Laybourn, Phyllis; Cairncross, Sandra; Gray, Morag; Brown, Norrie; Goldfinch, Judy; Earl, Shirley – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008
A study was conducted comparing the feedback received from students about teaching obtained using different instruments. Twelve first- and second-year undergraduate modules were selected from seven different schools within a single university. Students studying each module were allocated to "questionnaire" and "comparator" groups. "Questionnaire"…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Formative Evaluation, Focus Groups, Questionnaires
Download full textMarsh, Herbert W.; Grayson, David – 1993
The multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) paradigm is used widely to assess construct validity, but D. A. Kenny and D. A. Kashy (1992) lament that even after 30 years we still do not know how to analyze MTMM data. The Composite Direct Product (CDP) model has recently attracted considerable attention. Its strengths and weaknesses are evaluated, and a…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Construct Validity, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation
