Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Incidental Learning | 3 |
Sequential Learning | 3 |
Reaction Time | 2 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Age Groups | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Structures | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Diseases | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Meier, Beat | 2 |
Cock, Josephine | 1 |
Kaelin-Lang, Alain | 1 |
Karatekin, Canan | 1 |
Marcus, David J. | 1 |
Stephan, Marianne A. | 1 |
Weiermann, Brigitte | 1 |
White, Tonya | 1 |
Zaugg, Sabine Weber | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Weiermann, Brigitte; Cock, Josephine; Meier, Beat – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Implicit task sequence learning may be attributed to learning the order of perceptual stimulus features associated with the task sequence, learning a series of automatic task set activations, or learning an integrated sequence that derives from 2 correlated streams of information. In the present study, our purpose was to distinguish among these 3…
Descriptors: Sequential Learning, Incidental Learning, Stimuli, Reaction Time
Stephan, Marianne A.; Meier, Beat; Zaugg, Sabine Weber; Kaelin-Lang, Alain – Brain and Cognition, 2011
It is still unclear, whether patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are impaired in the incidental learning of different motor sequences in short succession, although such a deficit might greatly impact their daily life. The aim of this study was thus to clarify the relation between disease parameters of PD and incidental motor learning of two…
Descriptors: Diseases, Incidental Learning, Rating Scales, Patients
Karatekin, Canan; Marcus, David J.; White, Tonya – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007
The goal of this study was to examine incidental and intentional spatial sequence learning during middle childhood and adolescence. We tested four age groups (8-10 years, 11-13 years, 14-17 years, and young adults [18+ years]) on a serial reaction time task and used manual and oculomotor measures to examine incidental sequence learning.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Intentional Learning, Incidental Learning, Children