Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Karlidag, Rifat | 1 |
Kizkin, Sibel | 1 |
O'Brien, Lynn | 1 |
Ozcan, Cemal | 1 |
Ozisik, Handan Isin | 1 |
Segers, E. | 1 |
Witteman, M. J. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Witteman, M. J.; Segers, E. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2010
The modality learning effect proposes that learning is enhanced when information is presented in both the visual and the auditory domains (e.g. pictures and spoken information) compared with presenting information solely in the visual channel (e.g. pictures and written text). Most of the evidence for this effect comes from adults in a laboratory…
Descriptors: Intervention, Individual Differences, Elementary School Students, Adults
Kizkin, Sibel; Karlidag, Rifat; Ozcan, Cemal; Ozisik, Handan Isin – Brain and Cognition, 2006
Evoked potential studies have demonstrated that musicians have the ability to distinguish musical sounds preattentively and automatically at the temporal, spectral, and spatial levels in more detail. It is however not known whether there is a difference in the early processes of auditory data processing of musicians. The most emphasized and…
Descriptors: Musicians, Auditory Perception, Control Groups, Cognitive Processes

O'Brien, Lynn – NASSP Bulletin, 1989
Schools should probably spend more time developing student awareness of learning styles than pushing teachers into more inservice workshops on adapting curriculum. The Learning Channel Preference Checklist included in this article allows students to assess their own preferred learning style(s) by choosing statements stressing visual, auditory, or…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Cognitive Style, Elementary Secondary Education, Individual Differences