Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Learning Processes | 3 |
Botany | 2 |
Schemata (Cognition) | 2 |
Attribution Theory | 1 |
Beliefs | 1 |
Biology | 1 |
Computer Peripherals | 1 |
Concept Formation | 1 |
Concept Mapping | 1 |
Cytology | 1 |
Evaluation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Chase, Catherine C. | 1 |
Chi, Michelene T. H. | 1 |
Coley, John D. | 1 |
Floto, Christian | 1 |
Hayes, Brett | 1 |
Huk, Thomas | 1 |
Kerlen, Gertraude | 1 |
Lawson, Christopher | 1 |
Moloney, Michelle | 1 |
Roscoe, Rod D. | 1 |
Roy, Marguerite | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chi, Michelene T. H.; Roscoe, Rod D.; Slotta, James D.; Roy, Marguerite; Chase, Catherine C. – Cognitive Science, 2012
Studies exploring how students learn and understand science processes such as "diffusion" and "natural selection" typically find that students provide misconceived explanations of how the patterns of such processes arise (such as why giraffes' necks get longer over generations, or how ink dropped into water appears to "flow"). Instead of…
Descriptors: Instructional Effectiveness, Botany, Misconceptions, Scripts
Coley, John D.; Hayes, Brett; Lawson, Christopher; Moloney, Michelle – Cognition, 2004
Previous research (e.g. "Cognition" 64 (1997) 73) suggests that the privileged level for inductive inference in a folk biological conceptual hierarchy does not correspond to the ''basic'' level (i.e. the level at which concepts are both informative and distinct). To further explore inductive inference within conceptual hierarchies, we examine…
Descriptors: Inferences, Logical Thinking, Thinking Skills, Schemata (Cognition)
Sander, Uwe; Kerlen, Gertraude; Steinke, Mattias; Huk, Thomas; Floto, Christian – Cell Biology Education, 2003
Two CD-ROMs from a series dealing with various major aspects of cell biology are evaluated in this paper using quantitative and qualitative approaches. The findings delimit similarities and differences of the two CD-ROMs and shed light on how the programs could be used in the learning process and how they should not be. The overall impression, as…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Evaluators, Cytology, Learning Modules