Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Methods | 5 |
Test Items | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
Identification | 1 |
Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ansley, Timothy | 1 |
Cappaert, Kevin J. | 1 |
Chang, Hua-Hua | 1 |
Chang, Yu-Feng | 1 |
Chen, Hanwei | 1 |
Chen, Shu-Ying | 1 |
Conrad, Kendon J. | 1 |
Cui, Zhongmin | 1 |
Deng, Hui | 1 |
Dennis, Michael L. | 1 |
He, Yong | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cui, Zhongmin; Liu, Chunyan; He, Yong; Chen, Hanwei – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2018
Allowing item review in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is getting more attention in the educational measurement field as more and more testing programs adopt CAT. The research literature has shown that allowing item review in an educational test could result in more accurate estimates of examinees' abilities. The practice of item review in…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Test Wiseness
Cappaert, Kevin J.; Wen, Yao; Chang, Yu-Feng – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
Events such as curriculum changes or practice effects can lead to item parameter drift (IPD) in computer adaptive testing (CAT). The current investigation introduced a point- and weight-adjusted D[superscript 2] method for IPD detection for use in a CAT environment when items are suspected of drifting across test administrations. Type I error and…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Identification
Chen, Shu-Ying – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
To date, exposure control procedures that are designed to control test overlap in computerized adaptive tests (CATs) are based on the assumption of item sharing between pairs of examinees. However, in practice, examinees may obtain test information from more than one previous test taker. This larger scope of information sharing needs to be…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Methods, Test Items
Deng, Hui; Ansley, Timothy; Chang, Hua-Hua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2010
In this study we evaluated and compared three item selection procedures: the maximum Fisher information procedure (F), the a-stratified multistage computer adaptive testing (CAT) (STR), and a refined stratification procedure that allows more items to be selected from the high a strata and fewer items from the low a strata (USTR), along with…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Selection, Methods
Riley, Barth B.; Dennis, Michael L.; Conrad, Kendon J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
This simulation study sought to compare four different computerized adaptive testing (CAT) content-balancing procedures designed for use in a multidimensional assessment with respect to measurement precision, symptom severity classification, validity of clinical diagnostic recommendations, and sensitivity to atypical responding. The four…
Descriptors: Simulation, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis