NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cano, Maribel; Castelló, Montserrat; Leitão, Selma – Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2019
Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze how oral argumentative strategies, argumentative sequences and interaction patterns relate to argumentative content and the required learning objectives. Method: Two different kinds of debates were analyzed. In the first, the participants defended one point of view, while in the second the…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, College Freshmen, Debate, Oral Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grant, Camilla – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2007
Given the increasing import of asynchronous discussions to achieving learning objectives, this analysis proposes an exploratory assessment model that involves three levels of analysis, i.e., argument structure, disagreement, and interaction. The model promotes objective, systematic assessment; streamlines the assessment process; and clearly…
Descriptors: Asynchronous Communication, Persuasive Discourse, Discourse Analysis, Discussion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stewart, Craig O.; Setlock, Leslie D.; Fussell, Susan R. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
This study investigates cultural and communication medium effects on conversational argumentation in a decision-making context. Chinese and U.S. participants worked in pairs on two decision-making tasks via face-to-face (FtF) and instant messaging (IM). The analyses showed that Chinese participants tended to engage in potentially more complex…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Cross Cultural Studies, Interaction Process Analysis, Communication Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mulder, Martin; Brake, Jacqueline te – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1990
The design and reliability testing of two instruments--the Macro Argumentation Structure (MARS) and the Coalition forming and Dominance (CODOM)--to assess the deliberation process (argumentation and interaction) during curriculum conferences/decision making are reported. The study was conducted at the Department of Education of the University of…
Descriptors: College Curriculum, Conferences, Curriculum Development, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelken, Melissa L. – Journal of Legal Education, 1996
Psychoanalysis, which focuses on unconscious mental processes, in contrast with the aggressive rational, linear, and goal-oriented nature of legal thinking, is used as a framework for understanding the art of negotiation in legal work. It is argued that a psychoanalytic approach can help people understand how they may help or hinder themselves in…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Communication Skills, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Neu, Joyce – 1986
In cross-cultural negotiation, the participants must have prior training in what is culturally and linguistically appropriate in order to avoid serious misunderstandings and impasses. While negotiation is a common form of business interaction, there are cultural and linguistic patterns that are not always shared. Analysis of American English…
Descriptors: Arbitration, Classroom Techniques, Communication Problems, Cultural Awareness