Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Courtney, E. Wayne | 3 |
Ashby, Cornelia M. | 1 |
Brown, Hendricks | 1 |
Card, David | 1 |
Confrey, Jere | 1 |
Dickersin, Kay | 1 |
Elliott, David L. | 1 |
Gemin, Butch | 1 |
Greenhouse, Joel | 1 |
Jingwen Zheng | 1 |
Kling, Jeffrey | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 12 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
High Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Connecticut | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
New York | 1 |
Rhode Island | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mansi Wadhwa; Jingwen Zheng; Thomas D. Cook – Review of Educational Research, 2024
Clearinghouses set standards of scientific quality to vet existing research to determine how "evidence-based" an intervention is. This paper examines 12 educational clearinghouses to describe their effectiveness criteria, to estimate how consistently[underlined] they rate the same program, and to probe why their judgments differ. All the…
Descriptors: Clearinghouses, Standards, Evaluation Criteria, Reliability
Monahan, Shannon; Kratochwill, Thomas; Lipscomb, Stephen – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2011
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) seeks to provide educators, policymakers, researchers, and the public with a central and trusted source of scientific evidence for what works in education. The WWC was established in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES). It serves as a decision-making resource by…
Descriptors: Expertise, Evidence, Educational Research, Clearinghouses
Brown, Hendricks; Card, David; Dickersin, Kay; Greenhouse, Joel; Kling, Jeffrey; Littell, Julia – National Board for Education Sciences, 2008
Based on investigation and analysis of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) review process and reports, this panel concluded that: (1) WWC procedures and processes for identifying and extracting information from intervention studies are generally well documented and follow reasonable standards and practices for systematic reviews; and (2) WWC…
Descriptors: Clearinghouses, Educational Research, Federal Programs, Program Administration
Myint-U, Athi; O'Donnell, Lydia; Phillips, Dawna – Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands, 2012
This technical brief describes updates to a database of dropout prevention programs and policies in 2006/07 created by the Regional Education Laboratory (REL) Northeast and Islands and described in the Issues & Answers report, "Piloting a searchable database of dropout prevention programs in nine low-income urban school districts in the…
Descriptors: Dropout Prevention, Dropout Programs, Databases, Maintenance
Ashby, Cornelia M. – US Government Accountability Office, 2010
In connection with the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, GAO (Government Accountability Office) was required to study the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), a federal source of evidence about effective education practices. Operating through a 5-year contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the WWC…
Descriptors: Clearinghouses, Instructional Effectiveness, Federal Legislation, Evaluation Methods
McArthur, Genevieve – Australasian Journal of Special Education, 2008
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) provides online reports to the public about the scientific evidence for educational interventions. The quality of these reports is important because they effectively tell the non-scientific community which programmes do and do not work. The aim of this brief review is to assess WWC's report on a clinically…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Quality Control, Clearinghouses, Intervention
Courtney, E. Wayne – 1989
These two evaluation updates cover segments of the third phase of the Apprenticeship Training Materials Clearinghouse project, which is being conducted at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. The first update evaluates activities related to the following project objectives: conduct a field test on clearinghouse services; revise the model…
Descriptors: Apprenticeships, Clearinghouses, Databases, Field Tests
Courtney, E. Wayne – 1987
The four reports contained in this document cover the first phase of the Apprenticeship Training Materials Clearinghouse project, which is being conducted at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. The interim evaluation report assesses phase 1 of the project by listing a series of 17 bechmark questions and providing answers to each. Attached to…
Descriptors: Apprenticeships, Benchmarking, Clearinghouses, Databases
Courtney, E. Wayne – 1988
These four evaluation updates cover the second phase of the apprenticeship training materials clearinghouse project, which is being conducted at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. The first update evaluates project activities related to field-testing the clearinghouse services, analyzing the field test results, and developing mailing lists…
Descriptors: Apprenticeships, Behavioral Objectives, Clearinghouses, Field Tests
Elliott, David L. – 1978
A study was conducted (1) to describe the specific services of seven major career education information and technical assistance systems, including (but not limited to) content of each system, services offered, clients served, procedures for use, cost for each service, service area (geographic), response formats, response time, and utility of…
Descriptors: Career Education, Clearinghouses, Comparative Analysis, Information Centers
Confrey, Jere – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2006
This article summarizes the findings of the National Research Council (NRC) report "On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness" and examines the reviews in middle grades mathematics undertaken by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The NRC report reviewed and assessed 147 key evaluations of 13 National Science Foundation-supported K-12 mathematics…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Quasiexperimental Design, Content Analysis
Watson, John; Gemin, Butch; Ryan, Jennifer – Evergreen Education Group, 2008
"Keeping Pace" has several goals. First, it strives to add to the body of knowledge about online education policy and make recommendations for advances. Second, it serves as a reference source for information about programs and policies across the country, for both policymakers and practitioners who are new to online education as well as those who…
Descriptors: Online Surveys, Definitions, State Agencies, Computer Mediated Communication