Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 17 |
Journal Articles | 12 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
France | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Stewart B McKinney Homeless… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Le Menestrel, Suzanne M.; Walahoski, Jill S.; Mielke, Monica B. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
The 4-H youth development organization is a complex public--private partnership between the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the nation's Cooperative Extension system and National 4-H Council, a private, nonprofit partner. The current article is focused on a partnership approach to the…
Descriptors: Youth Programs, Evaluators, Cooperation, Evaluation Methods
Pitt, Penelope – Australian Educational Researcher, 2014
This article reflects on a university human research ethics committee's unease regarding a feminist visual pilot study within the field of education. The small exploratory study proposed to explore a migrant mother's production of her son's identity through her family photograph collection. The committee requested substantial…
Descriptors: Ethics, Committees, Educational Research, Feminism
Bell, Nancy B. – Research Management Review, 2013
Call it innovation, creativity, imagination, cutting edge, paradigm shift, or any other term for new information, an assessment of innovation may now impact the final decision on awarding grants to investigators. What exactly is innovation and how does the reviewer perceive innovation in the research approach? Procedures, the approach, and…
Descriptors: Grantsmanship, Innovation, Grants, Proposal Writing
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This essay explores the contributions of "Evaluation Practice" and the "American Journal of Evaluation" to our understanding of evaluation ethics. The review is organized according to the five Guiding Principles for Evaluators (Systematic Inquiry, Competence, Integrity/Honesty, Respect for People, and Responsibilities for General and Public…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Inquiry, Systems Approach
Tourmen, Claire – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
How do evaluation practitioners make choices when they evaluate a program? What function do evaluation theories play in practice? In this article, I report on an exploratory study that examined evaluation practices in France. The research began with observations of practitioners' activities, with a particular focus on the phases of evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Theory Practice Relationship
Giordano, Victoria; Nevin, Ann – Online Submission, 2007
In this paper, the authors describe the benefits and pitfalls of mixed methods designs. They argue that mixed methods designs may be preferred when evaluating professional development programs for p-K-12 education given the new call for accountability in making data-driven decisions. They summarize and critique the studies in terms of limitations…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Faculty Development, Accountability, Research Design

Riccio, James; Fitzpatrick, Jody L. – Evaluation Practice, 1997
The Greater Avenues for Independence (GAIN) welfare-to-work program in California was evaluated by the Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC). The evaluation relied on involvement of stakeholders, examination of program implementation, flexibility, the adaptation of evaluation questions and designs during the study, use of random…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Qualitative Research

Lipsey, Mark W. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
Explores the role of theory in strengthening causal interpretations in nonexperimental research. Evaluators must conduct theory-driven research, concentrating on "small theory," in that the focus is on the explanation of processes specific to the program being evaluated. Theory-guided treatment research must be programmatic and…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Effect Size, Evaluators, Generalization

Hennessy, Michael – Evaluation Practice, 1995
Propositions about what works in program evaluation are presented: (1) evaluators should be involved from the beginning; (2) evaluation should be based on explicit programmatic theory; (3) quasi-experimental designs must have high internal validity; and (4) evaluators must combat the deterioration of experimental control that occurs in…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Experiments, Program Development

Shea, Michael P.; And Others – Evaluation Practice, 1995
The experiences of a group of evaluators evaluating a multisite integrated human service delivery system illustrate many design and measurement considerations in the preimplementation and implementation phases of evaluation. The reemergence of human service integration approaches will make such evaluation issues increasingly common. (SLD)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Human Services

Thompson, Lyke; Herman, Sandra – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1996
This article provides a case study of the use of emergent design, which asks evaluators to adapt their inquiry processes as understanding develops, in the evaluation of a family support program, tracing the emergence of evaluation procedures through three phases. Two phases produced data that policymakers found very helpful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Family Programs
Donaldson, Stewart I. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
Program theory-driven evaluation science uses substantive knowledge, as opposed to method proclivities, to guide program evaluations. It aspires to update, clarify, simplify, and make more accessible the evolving theory of evaluation practice commonly referred to as theory-driven or theory-based evaluation. The evaluator in this chapter provides a…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
Galbraith, Lynn – 1986
An internal evaluation was carried out on the governing procedures of the Center for Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln during the spring semester, 1985-86. The evaluation focused on the major governance committee within the Center (the Center Executive Committee) and its relationship with the two other forms of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Governing Councils, Credibility, Decision Making
Fein, Edith; And Others – 1987
This paper describes experiences with in-house evaluation, using four case examples from Child and Family Services (a social service, child welfare, and mental health agency) in a meta-evaluation model to illustrate benefits and sensitivities of the internal evaluator's role. Projects reviewed were: (1) a child sexual abuse treatment team; (2) a…
Descriptors: Adults, Case Studies, Early Childhood Education, Evaluators
Office of Career Education (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. – 1977
This document, product of a review of eighty-one final performance and evaluation reports of elementary and secondary career education projects to identify needed improvements in career education program evaluation, has four parts. Part I, a critique of common evaluation practices, covers overall evaluation designs, reporting, questionnaires and…
Descriptors: Career Education, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2