Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Campbell, Gwendolyn | 1 |
Dzikovska, Myroslava | 1 |
Farrow, Elaine | 1 |
Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
Isabel Saúde | 1 |
Jackson, G. Tanner | 1 |
Jordan, Pamela | 1 |
José Luís Araújo | 1 |
Matthews, Danielle E. | 1 |
Moore, Johanna | 1 |
Olney, Andrew | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Grade 11 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Portugal | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
José Luís Araújo; Isabel Saúde – Journal of Chemical Education, 2024
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is profoundly shaping our society. Among various AI tools, ChatGPT stands out for its user-friendly nature and wide accessibility to the public. However, despite their countless potential benefits, these tools also face significant challenges, especially in sensitive areas like Education. In this…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing, Chemistry
Dzikovska, Myroslava; Steinhauser, Natalie; Farrow, Elaine; Moore, Johanna; Campbell, Gwendolyn – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2014
Within STEM domains, physics is considered to be one of the most difficult topics to master, in part because many of the underlying principles are counter-intuitive. Effective teaching methods rely on engaging the student in active experimentation and encouraging deep reasoning, often through the use of self-explanation. Supporting such…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Electronics, Energy, Science Instruction
Matthews, Danielle E.; VanLehn, Kurt; Graesser, Arthur C.; Jackson, G. Tanner; Jordan, Pamela; Olney, Andrew; Rosa, Andrew Carolyn P. – Cognitive Science, 2007
It is often assumed that engaging in a one-on-one dialogue with a tutor is more effective than listening to a lecture or reading a text. Although earlier experiments have not always supported this hypothesis, this may be due in part to allowing the tutors to cover different content than the noninteractive instruction. In 7 experiments, we tested…
Descriptors: Tutoring, Natural Language Processing, Physics, Computer Assisted Instruction