Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Scoring | 2 |
| Word Processing | 2 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Graham, Steve | 1 |
| Harris, Karen | 1 |
| Hebert, Michael | 1 |
| Shermis, Mark D. | 1 |
| Shneyderman, Aleksandr | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textGraham, Steve; Harris, Karen; Hebert, Michael – Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2011
During this decade there have been numerous efforts to identify instructional practices that improve students' writing. These include "Reading Next" (Biancarosa and Snow, 2004), which provided a set of instructional recommendations for improving writing, and "Writing Next" (Graham and Perin, 2007) and "Writing to Read" (Graham and Hebert, 2010),…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShermis, Mark D.; Shneyderman, Aleksandr; Attali, Yigal – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2008
This study was designed to examine the extent to which "content" accounts for variance in scores assigned in automated essay scoring protocols. Specifically it was hypothesised that certain writing genre would emphasise content more than others. Data were drawn from 1668 essays calibrated at two grade levels (6 and 8) using "e-rater[TM]", an…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Test Scoring Machines, Essays, Grade 8
