NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Shiyu; Lin, Haiyan; Chang, Hua-Hua; Douglas, Jeff – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and multistage testing (MST) have become two of the most popular modes in large-scale computer-based sequential testing. Though most designs of CAT and MST exhibit strength and weakness in recent large-scale implementations, there is no simple answer to the question of which design is better because different…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Format, Sequential Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Green, Jeffrey J.; Stone, Courtenay Clifford; Zegeye, Abera – Journal of Education for Business, 2014
Colleges and universities are being asked by numerous sources to provide assurance of learning assessments of their students and programs. Colleges of business have responded by using a plethora of assessment tools, including the Major Field Test in Business. In this article, the authors show that the use of the Major Field Test in Business for…
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, Student Evaluation, Accreditation (Institutions), Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kolloffel, Bas; Eysink, Tessa H. S.; de Jong, Ton; Wilhelm, Pascal – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2009
The current study investigated the effects of different external representational formats on learning combinatorics and probability theory in an inquiry based learning environment. Five conditions were compared in a pre-test post-test design: three conditions each using a single external representational format (Diagram, Arithmetic, or Text), and…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Inquiry, Active Learning, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meng, Anbo; Ye, Luqing; Roy, Daniel; Padilla, Pierre – Computers & Education, 2007
Automatic test generating system in distributed computing context is one of the most important links in on-line evaluation system. Although the issue has been argued long since, there is not a perfect solution to it so far. This paper proposed an innovative approach to successfully addressing such issue by the seamless integration of genetic…
Descriptors: Genetics, Mathematics, Computer Simulation, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Enders, Craig K.; Bandalos, Deborah L. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined the degree to which coefficient alpha is affected by including items with different distribution shapes within a unidimensional scale. Computer simulation results indicate that reliability does not increase dramatically as a result of using differentially shaped items within a scale. Discusses implications for test construction. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Reliability, Scaling, Statistical Distributions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reckase, Mark D.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
It is demonstrated, theoretically and empirically, that item sets can be selected that meet the unidimensionality assumption of most item response theory models, even though they require more than one ability for a correct response. A method for identifying such item sets for test development purposes is presented. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, H. Jane; Swaminathan, Hariharan – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
Performance of the logistic regression (LR) procedure was compared to that of the Mantel Haenszel (MH) procedure in the detection of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning on a simulation examining distributional properties of the LR and MH test statistics and the relative power of the two procedures. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Item Bias, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nandakumar, Ratna – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1993
The phenomenon of simultaneous differential item functioning (DIF) amplification and cancellation and the role of the SIBTEST approach in detecting DIF are investigated with a variety of simulated test data. The effectiveness of SIBTEST is supported, and the implications of DIF amplification and cancellation are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Education, Equations (Mathematics)
Liu, Xiufeng – 1992
The difference between compensatory and non-compensatory item response theory (IRT) models in terms of the dimensionality of test data generated by them, and its effect on the model-data-fit were examined. The STRESS (proportion of variance not accounted for by the multidimensional scaling model) and RSQ (proportion of variance accounted for by…
Descriptors: Chi Square, Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reise, Steven P.; Due, Allan M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
Previous person-fit research is extended through explication of an unexplored model for generating aberrant response patterns. The proposed model is then implemented to investigate the influence of test properties on the aberrancy detection power of a person-fit statistic. Difficulties of aberrancy detection are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Item Response Theory, Mathematical Models
Wainer, Howard; And Others – 1991
A series of computer simulations was run to measure the relationship between testlet validity and the factors of item pool size and testlet length for both adaptive and linearly constructed testlets. Results confirmed the generality of earlier empirical findings of H. Wainer and others (1991) that making a testlet adaptive yields only marginal…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Item Banks
Nandakumar, Ratna – 1994
By definition, differential item functioning (DIF) refers to unequal probabilities of a correct response to a test item by examinees from two groups when controlled for their ability differences. Simulation results are presented for an attempt to purify a test by separating out multidimensional items under the assumption that the intent of the…
Descriptors: Ability, Computer Simulation, Construct Validity, Educational Assessment
Tang, K. Linda; And Others – 1993
This study compared the performance of the LOGIST and BILOG computer programs on item response theory (IRT) based scaling and equating for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) using real and simulated data and two calibration structures. Applications of IRT for the TOEFL program are based on the three-parameter logistic (3PL) model.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equated Scores, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hambleton, Ronald K.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1993
Item parameter estimation errors in test development are highlighted. The problem is illustrated with several simulated data sets, and a conservative solution is offered for addressing the problem in item response theory test development practice. Steps that reduce the problem of capitalizing on chance in item selections are suggested. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Alsawalmeh, Yousef M.; Feldt, Leonard S. – Psychometrika, 1994
A modification of a test of the equality of nonindependent alpha reliability coefficients is proposed. It avoids the limitation that the product of the number of test parts times the number of subjects be quite large. Monte Carlo studies indicate that this test can be used in comparing interrater reliabilities. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Equations (Mathematics), Interrater Reliability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3