Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 9 |
Test Content | 9 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 8 |
Test Items | 6 |
Test Construction | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Selection | 3 |
Ability | 2 |
Computer Simulation | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Journal of Applied Testing… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Review of Research in… | 1 |
Author
Kingsbury, G. Gage | 2 |
Ackermann, Richard | 1 |
Ankenman, Robert D. | 1 |
Chang, Hua-Hua | 1 |
Chen, Shu-Ying | 1 |
Conrad, Kendon J. | 1 |
Dennis, Michael L. | 1 |
Eguez, Jane | 1 |
Ganguli, Debalina | 1 |
Hau, Kit-Tai | 1 |
Jacobsen, Jared | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 9 |
Journal Articles | 6 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Singapore | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Law School Admission Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wise, Steven L.; Kingsbury, G. Gage; Webb, Norman L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2015
The alignment between a test and the content domain it measures represents key evidence for the validation of test score inferences. Although procedures have been developed for evaluating the content alignment of linear tests, these procedures are not readily applicable to computerized adaptive tests (CATs), which require large item pools and do…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Alignment (Education), Test Content
Kettler, Ryan J. – Review of Research in Education, 2015
This chapter introduces theory that undergirds the role of testing adaptations in assessment, provides examples of item modifications and testing accommodations, reviews research relevant to each, and introduces a new paradigm that incorporates opportunity to learn (OTL), academic enablers, testing adaptations, and inferences that can be made from…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Literature Reviews, Testing, Testing Accommodations
Riley, Barth B.; Dennis, Michael L.; Conrad, Kendon J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
This simulation study sought to compare four different computerized adaptive testing (CAT) content-balancing procedures designed for use in a multidimensional assessment with respect to measurement precision, symptom severity classification, validity of clinical diagnostic recommendations, and sensitivity to atypical responding. The four…
Descriptors: Simulation, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis
Jacobsen, Jared; Ackermann, Richard; Eguez, Jane; Ganguli, Debalina; Rickard, Patricia; Taylor, Linda – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2011
A computer adaptive test (CAT) is a delivery methodology that serves the larger goals of the assessment system in which it is embedded. A thorough analysis of the assessment system for which a CAT is being designed is critical to ensure that the delivery platform is appropriate and addresses all relevant complexities. As such, a CAT engine must be…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Testing Programs, Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries
Leung, Chi-Keung; Chang, Hua-Hua; Hau, Kit-Tai – 2001
The multistage alpha-stratified computerized adaptive testing (CAT) design advocated a new philosophy of pool management and item selection using low discriminating items first. It has been demonstrated through simulation studies to be effective both in reducing item overlap rate and enhancing pool utilization with certain pool types. Based on…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Selection

Kingsbury, G. Gage; Zara, Anthony R. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1991
This simulation investigated two procedures that reduce differences between paper-and-pencil testing and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) by making CAT content sensitive. Results indicate that the price in terms of additional test items of using constrained CAT for content balancing is much smaller than that of using testlets. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Thomasson, Gary L. – 1997
Score comparability is important to those who take tests and those who use them. One important concept related to test score comparability is that of "equity," which is defined as existing when examinees are indifferent as to which of two alternate forms of a test they would prefer to take. By their nature, computerized adaptive tests…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
van der Linden, Wim J.; Reese, Lynda M. – 1997
A model for constrained computerized adaptive testing is proposed in which the information in the test at the ability estimate is maximized subject to a large variety of possible constraints on the contents of the test. At each item-selection step, a full test is first assembled to have maximum information at the current ability estimate fixing…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Chen, Shu-Ying; Ankenman, Robert D. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of four item selection rules--(1) Fisher information (F), (2) Fisher information with a posterior distribution (FP), (3) Kullback-Leibler information with a posterior distribution (KP), and (4) completely randomized item selection (RN)--with respect to the precision of trait estimation and the…
Descriptors: Test Length, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Selection