Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Examiners | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Institutionalized Persons | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Prisoners | 1 |
| Rating Scales | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Content | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Crespo, L. M. | 1 |
| Galbraith, R. M. | 1 |
| Holtzman, K. Z. | 1 |
| Panton, James H. | 1 |
| Swanson, D. B. | 1 |
| Wallach, P. M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPanton, James H. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Inmates score significantly lower on the second edition (BETA II) than on the first edition (BETA I), regardless of the order of administration. BETA I score distributions were unaffected by the order of administration. BETA II score distributions depended on whether BETA II was administered first or second. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Institutionalized Persons, Intelligence Tests, Prisoners
Direct linkWallach, P. M.; Crespo, L. M.; Holtzman, K. Z.; Galbraith, R. M.; Swanson, D. B. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2006
Purpose: In conjunction with curricular changes, a process to develop integrated examinations was implemented. Pre-established guidelines were provided favoring vignettes, clinically relevant material, and application of knowledge rather than simple recall. Questions were read aloud in a committee including all course directors, and a reviewer…
Descriptors: Test Items, Rating Scales, Examiners, Guidelines
