NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kendra E. Guinness; Philip N. Chase; Kylan S. Turner; Judah B. Axe – Journal of Behavioral Education, 2024
Graphing is a complex and critical skill for behavior analysts. We evaluated the effects of conceptual training modules and feedback checklists on verbal behavior about graphing conventions and adherence to graphing conventions with graduate students in behavior analysis. In Experiment 1, conceptual training increased the accuracy of verbal…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Check Lists, Sequential Approach, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Polk, Thad A.; Newell, Allen – Psychological Review, 1995
It is proposed that for deduction tasks for which the necessary information is provided verbally, the heart of deduction for untrained participants involves repeatedly reencoding the problem, a behavior referred to as verbal reasoning. Model theory accounts of deduction behavior are consistent with verbal reasoning. (SLD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Deduction, Encoding (Psychology), Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Epting, L. Kimberly; Critchfield, Thomas S. – Behavior Analyst, 2006
In Skinner's (1957) conceptual analysis, the process of self-editing is integral to the dynamic complexities of multiply determined verbal behavior, but the analysis has generated little in the way of an experimental analysis. The majority of scientific work on self-editing has taken place within linguistics and cognitive psycholinguistics. Here…
Descriptors: Verbal Communication, Psycholinguistics, Comparative Analysis, Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vrij, Aldert; Akehurst, Lucy; Soukara, Stavroula; Bull, Ray – Human Communication Research, 2004
This experiment examined children's and undergraduates' verbal and nonverbal deceptive behavior, and the extent to which their truths and lies could be correctly classified by paying attention to these responses. Participants (N = 196) aged 5-6, 10-11, and 14-15, as well as university undergraduates, participated in an erasing the blackboard…
Descriptors: Cues, Content Analysis, Nonverbal Communication, Deception