Descriptor
| Item Sampling | 2 |
| Mathematical Models | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Test Interpretation | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Flow Charts | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - General | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedvan der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
The restrictions on item difficulties that must be met when binomial models are applied to domain-referenced testing are examined. Both a deterministic and a stochastic conception of item responses are discussed with respect to difficulty and Guttman-type items. (Author/BH)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Item Sampling, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models
Douglass, James B. – 1979
A general process for testing the feasibility of applying alternative mathematical or statistical models to the solution of a practical problem is presented and flowcharted. The system is used to compare five models for test equating: (1) anchor test equating using classical test theory; (2) anchor test equating using the one-parameter logistic…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Flow Charts, Goodness of Fit
