Descriptor
Predictor Variables | 4 |
Dropout Characteristics | 3 |
Dropout Research | 2 |
Dropouts | 2 |
Drug Abuse | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Persistence | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Alcohol Abuse | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Frith, Sandra L. | 1 |
Hutchison, Jerry E. | 1 |
Joe, George W. | 1 |
Johnson, A.E., Jr. | 1 |
Skager, Rodney | 1 |
Speas, Carol | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - General | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Speas, Carol – 1989
The 1983 North Carolina Dropout Study and the 1988 North Carolina Follow-Up Dropout Study were conducted to provide baseline dropout data for North Carolina public high schools, to provide estimates of dropout rates, and to explore possible factors contributing to a student's decision to leave high school. The results of the 1983 study indicated…
Descriptors: Dropout Characteristics, Dropout Prevention, Dropout Research, Dropouts
Skager, Rodney; Frith, Sandra L. – 1989
Three groups of secondary school students were identified in the sample of over 7,000 high school students from the 1987/88 California Substance Use Survey based on patterns of involvement with alcohol and other drugs. Of primary interest are high risk users (HRUs) who engage in socially deplored and often dangerous forms of substance use. HRU…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Alcohol Abuse, Dropout Characteristics, Dropout Research

Joe, George W.; And Others – Journal of Drug Education, 1982
Investigated predictors of drug treatment retention of individual clients in terms of a contextual model. Found that the socioecological variables predicted the types of clients that entered treatment in terms of clinic level (aggregate) variables, and these predicted the corresponding individual level client variables and client outcomes. (Author)
Descriptors: Dropout Characteristics, Drug Abuse, Drug Rehabilitation, Individual Differences

Hutchison, Jerry E.; Johnson, A.E., Jr. – NASPA Journal, 1980
Multiple discriminant analysis is an effective research tool to approach the problem of student attrition. Using this method, the small, liberal arts college can more accurately identify students who are likely to persist. Academic achievement and nonacademic variables are coupled to enhance the power of discriminant analysis. (RC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, College Students, Discriminant Analysis