Descriptor
| Test Reliability | 5 |
| Rating Scales | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Age Differences | 2 |
| Behavior Rating Scales | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Achenbach, Thomas M. | 1 |
| Andrews, Jac | 1 |
| Edelbrock, Craig S. | 1 |
| Freeman, Brenda | 1 |
| Janzen, Henry | 1 |
| Lanning, Wayne | 1 |
| Powills, Judith A. | 1 |
| Poythress, Norman G., Jr. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - General | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Child Behavior Checklist | 1 |
| Minnesota Multiphasic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAchenbach, Thomas M.; Edelbrock, Craig S. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
Reports construction of editions of the child behavior profile for boys aged 12-16 and girls aged 6-11 and 12-16 years, as well as reliability and stability findings, comparisons between normal children and those referred for mental health services, and comparisons with findings for 6- to 11-year-old boys. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Children
Peer reviewedPoythress, Norman G., Jr. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Faschingbauer offered guidelines in selecting MMPI short forms as substitutes for the MMPI. This reviews empirical studies of the clinical validity of MMPI short forms and discusses MMPI-168, not considered in Faschingbauer's earlier article. Empirical evidence favors the Faschingbauer Abbreviated MMPI and the MMPI-168 over others. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Psychological Evaluation
Peer reviewedLanning, Wayne; Freeman, Brenda – Counselor Education and Supervision, 1994
Discusses revision of Supervisor Emphasis Rating Form (SERF) into ipsative instrument and suggests future research that could profitably be done with new instrument. Explains rationale for choosing ipsative format and presents findings of study conducted to establish instrument reliability. SERF-Revised is appended. (Author/NB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Counselor Educators, Graduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedAndrews, Jac; Janzen, Henry – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Presents globally oriented scoring sheet, reference guide, and rating scale for facilitating clinical hypotheses from children's Kinetic School Drawings (KSDs) and further empirical evaluations of KSD technique. Provides information on instrument construction and preliminary findings in terms of procedures' reliability and discriminant validity.…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Freehand Drawing
Powills, Judith A.; And Others – 1979
Language arts teachers participated in an inservice program, The Writer's Clinic, and evaluated their students' improvement in writing ability using holistic essay scoring techniques. Seventh and eighth grade students were administered an essay composition pretest in December; the same essay topic was given as the post test in May. Students were…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cost Effectiveness, Essay Tests, Essays
