The "Communication in the Disciplines" (Dannels, 2001) framework suggests that communication norms, genres, and standards for success are situated and disciplinary. In this introductory essay, I explore complexities that accompany a "communication in the disciplines" identity in practice--adopting a mindset of curiosity, an ability to listen carefully to other disciplines, and a willingness to let go of our own disciplinary biases. I discuss how contributing articles provide insight into various aspects of these CID complexities and offer McClintock's (as cited in Keller, 1983) idea of "leaning in" as a salient metaphor for CID work.