NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paige L. Kemp; Vanessa M. Loaiza; Colleen M. Kelley; Christopher N. Wahlheim – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2024
The efficacy of fake news corrections in improving memory and belief accuracy may depend on how often adults see false information before it is corrected. Two experiments tested the competing predictions that repeating fake news before corrections will either impair or improve memory and belief accuracy. These experiments also examined whether…
Descriptors: Young Adults, Older Adults, Beliefs, Misinformation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bayley M. Wellons; Christopher N. Wahlheim – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2025
Misinformation exposure can cause inaccurate beliefs and memories. These unwanted outcomes can be mitigated when misinformation reminders--veracity-labeled statements that repeat earlier-read false information--appear before corrections with true information. The present experiment used eye tracking to examine the role of attention while encoding…
Descriptors: Misinformation, Beliefs, Attitude Change, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paige L. Kemp; Alyssa H. Sinclair; R. Alison Adcock; Christopher N. Wahlheim – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2024
Fake news can have enduring effects on memory and beliefs. An ongoing theoretical debate has investigated whether corrections (fact-checks) should include reminders of fake news. The familiarity backfire account proposes that reminders hinder correction (increasing interference), whereas integration-based accounts argue that reminders facilitate…
Descriptors: Misinformation, Deception, Propaganda, Memory