NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Flocke, Elizabeth Lynne – 1989
To examine the status of opinion as protected speech, a study sought answers to three questions: (1) Is opinion protected under the constitution? (2) If protection exists for opinion, has it usurped the common law fair comment defense in libel litigation? and (3) How do the courts define opinion in the context of libel? Answers were sought in…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Content Analysis, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Padgett, George E. – Journalism Quarterly, 1982
Analyzes Judge Potter Stewart's voting record on First Amendment cases and concludes that he is one of the strongest supporters of the First Amendment on the Supreme Court. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Court Doctrine, Court Judges, Court Litigation
Parsons, Patrick R. – 1983
A review of federal court decisions in the area of cable television and First Amendment rights reveals an early, unified perception of cable's First Amendment status that has given way in the past decade to fragmented and often contradictory positions among lower level courts. This makes the problem before the courts today one of choosing from, or…
Descriptors: Cable Television, Content Analysis, Court Litigation, Decision Making
Siegel, Paul – 1987
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has been labeled an "enemy of the press" for his judicial opinions restricting or inhibiting the press's right to protected opinion. However, examination of his record suggests that his rulings do not constitute such a threat to journalistic freedom as many have been led to believe. His opinions…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Content Analysis, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lomicky, Carol S. – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
In "Hazelwood" the U.S. Supreme Court said public school officials can censor school-sponsored expression for legitimate educational purposes. A content-analysis case study of student-written newspaper editorials found that more than three times as many editorials of criticism were published prior to the Court's decision. Argues that…
Descriptors: Censorship, Content Analysis, Court Litigation, Criticism
Adams, David L. – 1984
To determine if Kansas scholastic journalism programs were being allowed to practice First Amendment rights as determined by federal court decisions since 1968, a study analyzed 177 questionnaires completed by principals, faculty advisers, and student editors at 75 randomly selected public high schools having student newspapers. Survey results…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Content Analysis, Court Litigation, Educational Research