Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 3 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Programs | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Engelhard, George, Jr. | 1 |
| McBee, Matthew T. | 1 |
| Peters, Scott J. | 1 |
| Randall, Jennifer | 1 |
| Rentz, R. Robert | 1 |
| Waterman, Craig | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Georgia | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Cognitive Abilities Test | 1 |
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcBee, Matthew T.; Peters, Scott J.; Waterman, Craig – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2014
Best practice in gifted and talented identification procedures involves making decisions on the basis of multiple measures. However, very little research has investigated the impact of different methods of combining multiple measures. This article examines the consequences of the conjunctive ("and"), disjunctive/complementary…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Correlation
Randall, Jennifer; Engelhard, George, Jr. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2010
The psychometric properties and multigroup measurement invariance of scores across subgroups, items, and persons on the "Reading for Meaning" items from the Georgia Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) were assessed in a sample of 778 seventh-grade students. Specifically, we sought to determine the extent to which score-based…
Descriptors: Testing Accommodations, Test Items, Learning Disabilities, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedRentz, R. Robert – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
This paper elaborates on the work of Cardinet, and others, by clarifying some points regarding calculations, specifically with reference to existing computer programs, and by presenting illustrative examples of the calculation and interpretation of several generalizability coefficients from a complex six-facet (factor) design. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computation, Computer Programs, Error of Measurement
