Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Classification | 6 |
Accuracy | 5 |
Reading Tests | 5 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 4 |
Grade 2 | 4 |
Reading Fluency | 4 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 6 | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Behavioral Research and… | 6 |
Author
Alonzo, Julie | 5 |
Anderson, Daniel | 5 |
Gerald Tindal | 1 |
Irvin, P. Shawn | 1 |
Joseph F. T. Nese | 1 |
Park, Bitnara Jasmine | 1 |
Tindal, Gerald | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 5 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 5 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
Primary Education | 5 |
Grade 2 | 4 |
Grade 3 | 4 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
Grade 5 | 4 |
Grade 6 | 4 |
Grade 7 | 4 |
Grade 8 | 4 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gerald Tindal; Joseph F. T. Nese – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2024
We present two types of validity evidence to support inferences and decisions about use of easyCBMs in relation to state testing programs. The first type involves the use of Benchmarks in reading to use in making predictions of performance on the Smarter Balanced (SB) test. These predictions can be made both well in advance (several months) or…
Descriptors: Classification, Accuracy, Validity, Criteria
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
In this technical report, we present results of classification accuracy analyses to identify cut scores to optimize sensitivity and specificity for the easyCBM literacy assessments in Kindergarten through Grade 2. In conducting these analyses, we used the following approach: We kept sensitivity above 0.80 and maximized specificity from there. If…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Curriculum Based Assessment, Response to Intervention, Kindergarten
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
This technical report is an addendum to a study we initially reported on in 2014 (Wray, Lai, Saez, Alonzo, & Tindal, 2014). In response to a request for additional analyses, in particular reporting confidence intervals around the results, we re-analyzed the data from the Wray et al study. This supplementary report presents the results of the…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Response to Intervention, Kindergarten, Grade 1
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
In response to a request for additional analyses, in particular reporting confidence intervals around the results, we re-analyzed the data from prior studies. This supplementary report presents the results of the additional analyses addressing classification accuracy, reliability, and criterion-related validity evidence. For ease of reference, we…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Computation, Statistical Analysis, Accuracy
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
In response to a request for additional analyses, in particular reporting confidence intervals around the results, we re-analyzed the data from prior studies. This supplementary report presents the results of the additional analyses addressing classification accuracy, reliability, and criterion-related validity evidence. For ease of reference, we…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Computation, Statistical Analysis, Classification
Irvin, P. Shawn; Park, Bitnara Jasmine; Anderson, Daniel; Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2011
This technical report presents results from a cross-validation study designed to identify optimal cut scores when using easyCBM[R] reading tests in Washington state. The cross-validation study analyzes data from the 2009-2010 academic year for easyCBM[R] reading measures. A sample of approximately 900 students per grade, randomly split into two…
Descriptors: Intervention, Diagnostic Tests, Response to Intervention, At Risk Students