Descriptor
Source
Computers and Composition | 23 |
Author
Markel, Mike | 2 |
Bebell, Damian | 1 |
Brady, Laura | 1 |
Burley, Hansel | 1 |
Chandler, Daniel | 1 |
Collins, Terence | 1 |
Corbelli, Mary | 1 |
Cowan, Jennifer | 1 |
Cross, Geoffrey | 1 |
Dierckins, Tony | 1 |
Eklundh, Kerstin Severinson | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 23 |
Reports - Research | 23 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Writing Apprehension Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hill, Charles A.; And Others – Computers and Composition, 1991
Discusses why recent studies of word processing offer contradicting results about computer-assisted revision. Examines how writers' cognitive processes for revision are affected by word processing. Finds that (1) experienced writers define revision to include more global-level changes, whereas students tend to focus on local-level concerns; and…
Descriptors: Computers, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Word Processing

Chandler, Daniel – Computers and Composition, 1994
Surveys British academics. Reveals a divide between writers who favor a word processor as their main writing tool and those who favor the pen or pencil. Finds that word processors are both indirect and delayed. Suggests that educators may need to legitimate handwritten drafts or reversion to handwriting for some word-processor users. (RS)
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Handwriting, Higher Education, Word Processing

Harrington, Susanmarie; Shermis, Mark D.; Rollins, Angela L. – Computers and Composition, 2000
Considers whether differences might emerge in writing quality when students wrote examinations by hand or on a computer, and whether raters differed in their evaluation of essays written by hand, on a computer, or by hand and then transcribed to typed form before scoring. Finds no statistically significant differences in ratings among the three…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Student Placement, Testing

Etchison, Craig – Computers and Composition, 1989
Examines the effects of word processing on writing quality and the amount of text produced by basic writers. Finds that students using computers wrote more, but that there was no difference in quality between those who used a word processor and those who did not. (MS)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Higher Education, Word Processing, Writing Improvement

Markel, Mike – Computers and Composition, 1998
Finds that college students were aware of, and understood the function of, some common design elements (boldface, italics, numbered lists) but were much less aware of other design elements (headers, indentation, and line spacing); and that perceptions of design elements correlated strongly with self-reported experience using word processing…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Layout (Publications), Student Attitudes, Word Processing

Markel, Mike – Computers and Composition, 1994
Examines relationships among computer experience, attitudes, writing behaviors, and writing quality for advanced undergraduate students who have owned Macintosh computers for at least three years. Finds that writing attitudes and practices are fairly well ingrained for the less competent writers, and they need to become comfortable with the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students, Word Processing

Eklundh, Kerstin Severinson – Computers and Composition, 1994
Examines critically the claim that computers give rise to nonlinear writing. Presents a new computer-based research tool, "S-Notation," that can automatically trace a writer's revisions to a text in their natural order. Presents an ongoing study that applies this method to assess the effect of the writing task on the linearity of text production.…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Research Methodology, Research Tools, Word Processing

Lansman, Marcy; And Others – Computers and Composition, 1993
Describes an experimental computer program called the "Writing Environment" designed to help writers create well-structured texts on-screen. Outlines a study done in which writers were asked to use the program so that their writing strategies could then be analyzed. Provides data and conclusions of the study. (HB)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computers, Higher Education

Dierckins, Tony – Computers and Composition, 1994
Examines argumentative and research papers written by students using Macintoshes in comparison to those written using IBM-compatibles. Finds that differences are not large enough to justify claims that the use of a graphical user interface affects writing skills. Suggests that rapid changes in technology makes the issue moot. (RS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer System Design, Higher Education

Phinney, Marianne – Computers and Composition, 1991
Examines changes in writing apprehension and blocking behavior among first- and second-language writers in first-year composition classes using computers. Finds that computer use alone did not reduce overall apprehension for either group and that it reduced blocking behavior for second-language writers but not for first-language writers. (SR)
Descriptors: Computers, English (Second Language), Higher Education, Native Speakers

Slattery, Patrick J.; Kowalski, Rosemary – Computers and Composition, 1998
Suggests that when first-year students composed on screen, they developed a tendency to expand their writing processes; and that when upper-level students did, they tended to collapse their processes. Suggests that first-year and upper-level students interacting with a computer can learn and adopt different types of writing strategies. (SR)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Juniors, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education

Brady, Laura – Computers and Composition, 1990
Explores how computer-assisted instruction (the ACCESS program) affected teaching goals and student responses in a freshman composition course. Finds that the quantity of student writing increased dramatically. Suggests that word processing offers new ways to provoke students' thoughts, encourage collaboration, and create a lively and interactive…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Computer Assisted Instruction, Freshman Composition, Higher Education

Cross, Geoffrey – Computers and Composition, 1990
Assesses how three basic writers adapted word processing to their writing. Finds that basic writers who were given little guidance in integrating the computer into their composing processes generated little material on the screen and in other ways made far less than full use of the word processor. (RS)
Descriptors: Basic Writing, Computer Assisted Instruction, Higher Education, Remedial Programs

Schwartz, Helen J.; Fitzpatrick, Christine Y.; Huot, Brian A. – Computers and Composition, 1994
Asks undergraduate students to respond to a series of questions by hand and using a word processor. Finds that some students felt profoundly disadvantaged writing by hand, and students who felt uncomfortable on the computer wrote longer and better developed responses in that medium. Suggests that a computer-assisted tutorial may act like L.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students
An AlphaSmart for Each Student: Do Teaching and Learning Change with Full Access to Word Processors?

Russell, Michael; Bebell, Damian; Cowan, Jennifer; Corbelli, Mary – Computers and Composition, 2003
Notes regular use of computers for writing over an extended period of time has a positive impact on the quantity and quality of student writing. Examines how teaching and learning change when three fourth-grade classrooms are equipped with one AlphaSmart (a portable writing device) for each student. Finds increased use of AlphaSmart by students…
Descriptors: Grade 4, Intermediate Grades, Student Attitudes, Student Improvement
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2