Descriptor
Scoring Formulas | 12 |
Test Reliability | 5 |
Guessing (Tests) | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Cutting Scores | 2 |
Factor Analysis | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
Probability | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 12 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 12 |
Reports - Research | 12 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Psychological… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Thomas, Charles R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
A rational approach to standard transformed scores which always results in the numerical to letter grade correspondence for any chosen hypothetical grade distribution model is developed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Scoring Formulas, Transformations (Mathematics), Weighted Scores

Livingston, Samuel A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
A specified minimum performance level can be translated into a minimum passing score for the written test by measuring the performance of students whose written test scores are near the desired cutoff score. Stochastic approximation methods accomplish this purpose. The up-and-down method and the Robbins-Monro process are compared. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Educational Testing, Occupational Tests, Scoring Formulas

Gorsuch, Richard L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Kaiser and Michael reported a formula for factor scores giving an internal consistency reliability and its square root, the domain validity. Using this formula is inappropriate if variables are included which have trival weights rather than salient weights for the factor for which the score is being computed. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Scoring Formulas, Test Reliability

Hsu, Louis M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Though the Paired-Item-Score (Eakin and Long) (EJ 174 780) method of scoring true-false tests has certain advantages over the traditional scoring methods (percentage right and right minus wrong), these advantages are attained at the cost of a larger risk of misranking the examinees. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Objective Tests, Probability

Aamodt, Michael G.; Pierce, Walter L., Jr. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Data from five separate samples were weighted using the vertical percent method (England) and the rare response method (Telenson, Alexander, and Barrett) to investigate their relative effectiveness for scoring biographical information blanks. Vertical percent scoring yielded significant validity coefficients for all samples, while rare response…
Descriptors: Biographical Inventories, Employees, Job Performance, Predictive Validity

Raju, Nambury S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
Rajaratnam, Cronbach and Gleser's generalizability formula for stratified-parallel tests and Raju's coefficient beta are generalized to estimate the reliability of a composite of criterion-referenced tests, where the parts have different cutting scores. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Mathematical Formulas, Scoring Formulas

Wilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Technical problems in achievement testing associated with using latent structure models to estimate the probability of guessing correct responses by examinees is studied; also the lack of problems associated with using Wilcox's formula score. Maximum likelihood estimates are derived which may be applied when items are hierarchically related.…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics

Willson, Victor L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
The Serlin-Kaiser procedure is used to complete a principal components solution for scoring weights for all options of a given item. Coefficient alpha is maximized for a given multiple choice test. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Factor Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas

Hocevar, Dennis; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Two multitrait-multimethod studies were conducted to investigate the effects of two scoring formulas. The study demonstrates that tests of divergent thinking lack discriminant validity when scored in the usual manner. A percentage formula did enhance discriminant validity when originality ratings were subjectively determined. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Divergent Thinking, Grade 5

Aiken, Lewis R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Procedures for computing content validity and consistency reliability coefficients and determining the statistical significance of these coefficients are described. Procedures employing the multinomial probability distribution for small samples and normal curve probability estimates for large samples, can be used where judgments are made on…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Measurement Techniques, Probability, Questionnaires
Willingness to Answer Multiple-Choice Questions as Manifested Both in Genuine and in Nonsense Items.

Frary, Robert B.; Hutchinson, T.P. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
Alternate versions of Hutchinson's theory were compared, and one which implies the existence of partial knowledge was found to be better than one which implies that an appropriate measure of ability is obtained by applying the conventional correction for guessing. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Latent Trait Theory, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas

Gough, Harrison G.; Lanning, Kevin – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
To forecast four-year, two-year, and single-course grades in college, a California Psychological Inventory equation was developed. Cross-validational coefficients for scores on the equation were .38 for 326 males and .36 for 570 females. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Grade Prediction, Higher Education, Personality Measures