Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Test Norms | 5 |
| Personality Measures | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Age Differences | 2 |
| Factor Structure | 2 |
| Sex Differences | 2 |
| Behavior Rating Scales | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement and Evaluation in… | 5 |
Author
| Ahn, Christine M. | 1 |
| Bratton, Sue C. | 1 |
| Cummings, William H., III | 1 |
| Dillman Taylor, Dalena | 1 |
| Ebesutani, Chad | 1 |
| Hancock, Gregory R. | 1 |
| Henson, Robin K. | 1 |
| Kamphaus, Randy W. | 1 |
| Lucas, Ellen B. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Beck Anxiety Inventory | 1 |
| Beck Depression Inventory | 1 |
| Behavior Assessment System… | 1 |
| Brief Symptom Inventory | 1 |
| My Vocational Situation | 1 |
| Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkDillman Taylor, Dalena; Bratton, Sue C.; Henson, Robin K. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2019
A split-sample cross-validation confirmatory factor analysis (N = 1,210) confirmed the 4-factor structure of the Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment (APPA) with 2 distinct subsamples. Discriminant validity, prevalence rates of priorities, and preliminary group norms are reported.
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Factor Structure, Test Validity, Test Norms
Ahn, Christine M.; Ebesutani, Chad; Kamphaus, Randy W. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2014
The present study was the first to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2, Self-Report of Personality, College Version (K-BASC-2 SRP-COL), among a Korean national sample. Using 1,000 Korean college students, ages 18 to 25 years, we found support for the reliability (via internal…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Behavior Rating Scales, Personality Measures, College Students
Peer reviewedHancock, Gregory R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1997
Analyzes two methods of testing group differences of a latent variable: group code analysis and structured means analysis. Describes these methods in terms of conceptual representation, unique underlying assumptions, and relative merits and limitations; points toward methodological extensions beyond this two-sample case. (RJM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Problems, Group Dynamics, Group Unity, Models
Peer reviewedLucas, Ellen B.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1988
Examined relationship between My Vocational Situation (MVS) scores and students' grade point averages and differences related to age or sex using college freshmen (N=2,532). Results provided a considerable amount of normative, psychometric, and comparative data about the MVS. (Author/ABL)
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Freshmen, Diagnostic Tests, Grade Point Average
Peer reviewedCummings, William H., III – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1995
Reports results of analyses of key tables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Atlas of Type Tables. Significant age group effects on every dimension indicates the need to reestimate population norms for each continuum on the MBTI for interpreting scores of people of various ages. (LKS)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Effect Size, Extraversion Introversion, Individual Development
