NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kebede, Mihiretu M.; Le Cornet, Charlotte; Fortner, Renée Turzanski – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
We aimed to evaluate the performance of supervised machine learning algorithms in predicting articles relevant for full-text review in a systematic review. Overall, 16,430 manually screened titles/abstracts, including 861 references identified relevant for full-text review were used for the analysis. Of these, 40% (n = 6573) were sub-divided for…
Descriptors: Automation, Literature Reviews, Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sandra McKeown; Zuhaib M. Mir – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Searching multiple resources to locate eligible studies for research syntheses can result in hundreds to thousands of duplicate references that should be removed before the screening process for efficiency. Research investigating the performance of automated methods for deduplicating references via reference managers and systematic review software…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Evaluation, Followup Studies, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Muller, Ashley Elizabeth; Ames, Heather Melanie R.; Jardim, Patricia Sofia Jacobsen; Rose, Christopher James – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Systematic reviews are resource-intensive. The machine learning tools being developed mostly focus on the study identification process, but tools to assist in analysis and categorization are also needed. One possibility is to use unsupervised automatic text clustering, in which each study is automatically assigned to one or more meaningful…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Automation, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lena Schmidt; Saleh Mohamed; Nick Meader; Jaume Bacardit; Dawn Craig – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
The amount of grey literature and 'softer' intelligence from social media or websites is vast. Given the long lead-times of producing high-quality peer-reviewed health information, this is causing a demand for new ways to provide prompt input for secondary research. To our knowledge, this is the first review of automated data extraction methods or…
Descriptors: Automation, Natural Language Processing, Literature Reviews, Data Collection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Altena, Allard J.; Spijker, René; Leeflang, Mariska M. G.; Olabarriaga, Sílvia Delgado – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
When performing a systematic review, researchers screen the articles retrieved after a broad search strategy one by one, which is time-consuming. Computerised support of this screening process has been applied with varying success. This is partly due to the dependency on large amounts of data to develop models that predict inclusion. In this…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Automation, Diagnostic Tests, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bashir, Rabia; Dunn, Adam G.; Surian, Didi – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
Few data-driven approaches are available to estimate the risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates. We developed a rule-based approach to automatically extract information from reviews and updates to be used as features for modelling conclusion change risk. Rules were developed to extract relevant information from published Cochrane…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Data, Automation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haynes, Emily; Garside, Ruth; Green, Judith; Kelly, Michael P.; Thomas, James; Guell, Cornelia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Approaches to synthesizing qualitative data have, to date, largely focused on integrating the findings from published reports. However, developments in text mining software offer the potential for efficient analysis of large pooled primary qualitative datasets. This case study aimed to (a) provide a step-by-step guide to using one software…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Data, Synthesis, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Altena, A. J.; Spijker, R.; Olabarriaga, S. D. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Systematic reviews are a cornerstone of today's evidence-informed decision making. With the rapid expansion of questions to be addressed and scientific information produced, there is a growing workload on reviewers, making the current practice unsustainable without the aid of automation tools. While many automation tools have been developed and…
Descriptors: Automation, Adoption (Ideas), Literature Reviews, Research Methodology