NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Type
Reports - Research36
Journal Articles24
Speeches/Meeting Papers11
Information Analyses1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 36 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeJesus, Jasmine M.; Gelman, Susan A.; Lumeng, Julie C. – Developmental Psychology, 2022
Although children frequently engage in creative activities (in which they make foods and objects by hand), the development and scope of children's thinking about handmade items is largely unexplored. In the present studies, we examined whether 4- to 12-year-old children at a local children's museum (54% girls, 46% boys; 51% White, 11% Asian/Asian…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Preadolescents, Museums, Value Judgment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lodewyk, Ken R.; Bracco, Elizabeth – ICHPER-SD Journal of Research, 2018
Two weeks into a new academic school year, a physical education (PE) class of 25 grade nine girls completed a survey relative to their previous PE experiences. Following the completion of a six-lesson territorial games unit using the six-step teaching game for understanding (TGfU) model taught by a guest certified female teacher with TGfU…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Females, Educational Games, Physical Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lahat, Ayelet; Helwig, Charles C.; Zelazo, Philip David – Child Development, 2013
The neurocognitive development of moral and conventional judgments was examined. Event-related potentials were recorded while 24 adolescents (13 years) and 30 young adults (20 years) read scenarios with 1 of 3 endings: moral violations, conventional violations, or neutral acts. Participants judged whether the act was acceptable or unacceptable…
Descriptors: Value Judgment, Moral Values, Brain, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hilliard, Lacey J.; Buckingham, Mary H.; Geldhof, G. John; Gansert, Patricia; Stack, Caroline; Gelgoot, Erin S.; Bers, Marina U.; Lerner, Richard M. – Applied Developmental Science, 2018
Video games have the potential to be contexts for moral learning. We investigated whether "Quandary," a video game designed to promote ethical thinking and moral considerations for decision-making, would help promote positive skills such as perspective taking and empathy in adolescents. We examined the effect of playing…
Descriptors: Perspective Taking, Decision Making, Educational Games, Video Games
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lane, Diarmaid; Seery, Niall; Gordon, Seamus – Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 2009
As education plays such a vital role in economic competitiveness, it is no surprise that the focus for many governments is to invest in educational initiatives. Innovation in pedagogy, refined curriculum and much research into the science of teaching and learning is hoped to promote a knowledge economy. In recent years the Irish education systems…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Technology Education, Freehand Drawing, Value Judgment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gibbs, John C.; Basinger, Karen S.; Grime, Rebecca L.; Snarey, John R. – Developmental Review, 2007
This article revisits Kohlberg's cognitive developmental claims that stages of moral judgment, facilitative processes of social perspective-taking, and moral values are commonly identifiable across cultures. Snarey [Snarey, J. (1985). "The cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research."…
Descriptors: Maturity (Individuals), Moral Values, Value Judgment, Moral Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silcock, P. J. – Educational Review, 1984
The social judgments of 75 subjects aged 11 and 75 aged 14 were compared using Peel's three categories of judgment to measure and evaluate responses. Clear, if limited, evidence for progress between the two ages in the ability to judge other people's perspectives was obtained, in line with Peel's general theory. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cognitive Development, Perspective Taking, Social Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Overton, Willis F. – New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2000
Discusses the history of the dichotomy drawn between fact and value, tracing its development from modernity to postmodernity. Advocates a relational approach that permits diversity in the context of unity, in which the conditions "is" and "ought" are complimentary. (JPB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Moral Development, Moral Values, Postmodernism
Moran, James D., III; O'Brien, Gayle – 1980
The developmental sequence of preschool children's moral judgments, and their emphasis on intentions versus property damage was investigated. Eight moral judgment stories with drawings were read to twelve 3 1/2- and twelve 4 1/2-year-old children (mean ages = 46.6 and 54.0 months, respectively). The stories included either positive or negative…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Moral Development, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lourenco, Orlando – New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2000
Investigates the ways in which young adults make judgments about two contrasting kinds of rights: moral worthiness (the aretaic) and moral obligation (the deontic), reflecting on how thinking in these areas may be coordinated with responsibility judgments and behavior. Discusses what might be gained if the aretaic domain were taken into account in…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Moral Development, Moral Values, Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kalish, Charles W. – New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2000
Argues that in addition to domains of value, young children recognize distinct domains of truth. Notes that although value judgments have been shown to be differentiated by age 4, research suggests truth judgments may not be similarly differentiated before grade school age. (JPB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Developmental Stages
Frank, Monica A.; And Others – 1987
Since Kohlberg (1958) first extended the cognitive developmental theory of moral judgment to include moral reasoning in adults, it has been found that women tended to score at a lower developmental stage than did men. Gilligan (1982) has conceptualized women's moral reasoning as being different in kind from men's moral reasoning, with women's…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Empathy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; Prencipe, Angela – Child Development, 1999
Examined 6-, 8-, and 10-year olds' conceptions of flags as social conventions and their understandings of the symbolic and psychological consequences associated with transgressions toward flags. Found that despite age-related increases in understanding of flags as meaningful collective symbols, children at all ages considered transgressions to be…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Childhood Attitudes, Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bussey, Kay – Child Development, 1999
Investigated 4-, 8-, and 11-year-olds' ability to categorize intentionally false and true statements as lies and truths. Found that older children were more likely to categorize false statements as lies and true statements as truths than were 4-year-olds. Antisocial lies were rated as most serious, and "white lies" as least serious.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mant, Catherine M.; Perner, Josef – Developmental Psychology, 1988
Three experiments investigated five- and 10-year-old children's understanding of the conditions under which a person becomes committed to carrying out an intended action. Findings indicated that, although children from a very early age have the concept of commmitment, the understanding of the interpersonal conditions for becoming committed…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Comprehension, Concept Formation, Elementary Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3