Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 3 |
Group Behavior | 3 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Black Students | 1 |
College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Testing | 1 |
Discourse Modes | 1 |
Error Correction | 1 |
Females | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ayodapo Oluwadare Jegede | 1 |
Carey, Jane M. | 1 |
Gerritz, Kalle | 1 |
Kacmar, Charles, J. | 1 |
Scheuneman, Janice Dowd | 1 |
Theophilus Ehidiamen Oamen | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Nigeria | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Theophilus Ehidiamen Oamen; Ayodapo Oluwadare Jegede – Research in Pedagogy, 2024
Most student performance metrics are based on quantitative assessment from traditional test and examination scores. However, there is an apparent scarcity of exploratory qualitative studies to examine the characterization of traits, attitudes, and behaviors that may influence students' performance outcomes. Moreso because such characterization…
Descriptors: Pharmaceutical Education, Foreign Countries, Performance, Undergraduate Students

Carey, Jane M.; Kacmar, Charles, J. – Computers in Human Behavior, 1997
It is often presumed that software technology will increase group productivity, but this may not be the case. Examines the impact of technology on time-to-complete-task, member satisfaction, perceived information load, number of contributing transactions, and task complexity. Three appendices provide examples of complex and simple tasks and the…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Discourse Modes, Group Behavior, Information Transfer

Scheuneman, Janice Dowd; Gerritz, Kalle – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1990
Differential item functioning (DIF) methodology for revealing sources of item difficulty and performance characteristics of different groups was explored. A total of 150 Scholastic Aptitude Test items and 132 Graduate Record Examination general test items were analyzed. DIF was evaluated for males and females and Blacks and Whites. (SLD)
Descriptors: Black Students, College Entrance Examinations, College Students, Comparative Testing