NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 187 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rebecca M. Teasdale; Cherie M. Avent; Ceily L. Moore; María B. Serrano Abreu; Xinru Yan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
Evaluators must attend to the destructive forces of racialization and racism to contribute to social transformation. Thus, evaluators are called to center culture, context, equity, and social justice during each step of the evaluation process. Here, we focus on the step(s) in which evaluators define program quality and specify evaluative lines of…
Descriptors: Racism, Evaluation Criteria, Social Justice, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mason, Sarah – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Evaluators often lament that the general public does not understand what we do. Yet, there is limited empirical research on what the general public does know--and think--about program evaluation. This article seeks to expand our understanding in this domain by capturing views about evaluation from a demographically representative sample of the U.S…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Communication Strategies, Evaluators, Public Opinion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zebo Xu; Prerit S. Mittal; Mohd. Mohsin Ahmed; Chandranath Adak; Zhenguang G. Cai – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2025
The rise of the digital era has led to a decline in handwriting as the primary mode of communication, resulting in negative effects on handwriting literacy, particularly in complex writing systems such as Chinese. The marginalization of handwriting has contributed to the deterioration of penmanship, defined as the ability to write aesthetically…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Writing Skills, Chinese, Ideography
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
This article aims to review and comment on the articles in this Special Issue and suggest directions for Singaporean evaluators to consider in the future. Based on the review, we found education evaluators in Singapore are familiar with up-to-date evaluation theories and approaches and successfully apply them. We also found that a substantial…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Educational Research, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Abbato, Samantha – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
The merit of narrative film methods to support participatory approaches and professional development has been increasingly demonstrated by research in several fields and education. However, the use of digital storytelling and other film methods in evaluation remains largely unchartered territory. This article provides a case study of a digital…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Nonprofit Organizations, Community Organizations, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wingate, Lori A.; Robertson, Kelly; FitzGerald, Michael; Rucks, Lana; Tsuzaki, Takara; Clasen, Carla; Schwob, Jeremy – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
In this study, we investigated the impact of the evaluation capacity building (ECB) efforts of an organization by examining the evaluation plans included in funding proposals over a 14-year period. Specifically, we sought to determine the degree to which and how evaluation plans in proposals to one National Science Foundation (NSF) program changed…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Capacity Building, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tucker, Susan; Stevahn, Laurie; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article compares the purposes and content of the four foundational documents of the American Evaluation Association (AEA): the Program Evaluation Standards, the AEA Public Statement on Cultural Competence in Evaluation, the AEA Evaluator Competencies, and the AEA Guiding Principles. This reflection on alignment is an early effort in the third…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Comparative Analysis, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Travis R. Moore; Luke Carmichael Valmadrid; Robyn Baragwanath; Nathaniel Haack; Lori Bakken – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The ethical guidelines for the American Evaluation Association and the principles of community-based participatory evaluation both state the importance of equitable stakeholder involvement. Regardless of the evaluation approach, however, evaluators are often confronted with gatekeepers, or those who control the access to stakeholders, information,…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Evaluators, Ethics, Community Involvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Garcia, Gabriela L.; Stevahn, Laurie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
This article reports research that examined the meaning of two broad evaluator competency domains. The first is "situational awareness" (SA) that focuses on understanding the unique contexts of evaluations and their users/stakeholders. The second is "interpersonal competence" (IC) that focuses on social skills needed for…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Interpersonal Competence, Job Skills, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boyce, Ayesha S.; Tovey, Tiffany L.S.; Onwuka, Onyinyechukwu; Moller, J.R.; Clark, Tyler; Smith, Aundrea – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
More evaluators have anchored their work in equity-focused, culturally responsive, and social justice ideals. Although we have a sense of approaches that guide evaluators as to how they should attend to culture, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), we have not yet established an empirical understanding of how evaluators measure DEI. In this…
Descriptors: Definitions, Inclusion, Equal Education, Social Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Persaud, Nadini; Dagher, Ruby – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
This article shares lessons from the field with program evaluations in the English-Speaking Commonwealth Caribbean (ESCC) region. The research highlighted that the challenges faced by evaluators working in the ESCC are quite similar to those experienced by evaluators elsewhere. However, the findings note the impact of the region's colonial past…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Regional Characteristics, Experience, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moore, Marah; Parsons, Beverly; Jessup, Patricia – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Evaluators are becoming increasingly aware that, to provide maximum benefit to the programs they evaluate, they must address the systems within which the programs work. However, evaluation practice is often influenced by beliefs and assumptions that are rooted in an understanding of these systems as stable and predictable. We identify four traps…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Systems Approach, Beliefs, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jordon J. Beasley – Professional School Counseling, 2024
Given the ever-evolving role of school counselors and increasing demands placed on them in today's sociopolitical climate, proficiency in program evaluation is more important than ever as school counselors advocate for their role and for comprehensive school counseling program delivery in schools. This article presents a reexamination of the…
Descriptors: Professional Identity, Counselor Training, Decision Making, Self Efficacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurteau, Marthe; Rahmanian, Jeiran; Houle, Sylvain; Marchand, Marie-Pier – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Expert intuition is increasingly considered to be a valid form of knowledge, and research has proven its effectiveness in judgment and decision making in various fields. Theorists seem to recognize the contributions of intuition within evaluative practice, but it has never been well-documented. This article presents a study on expert intuition,…
Descriptors: Intuition, Evaluative Thinking, Decision Making, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clements, Naomi; Davies, Sara; Mountford-Zimdars, Anna – Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2022
Professionalising outreach and evaluation work would enhance the quality and rigour of provision, benefit widening participation students and achieve regulatory requirements (Bowes et al. [2019]. "The National Collaborative Outreach Programme End of Phase 1 report for the national formative and impact evaluations." Office for Students;…
Descriptors: Professionalism, Outreach Programs, Program Evaluation, Social Justice
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13