NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kirshner, Barry J.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Heterosexually balanced groups were exposed to encounter-group tapes instructing them to share initmate experiences. Examples of high self-disclosure and openness were presented. Exercises differed only in instructions and accompanying behavioral examples. Results indicated that higher levels of disclosure produced greater group cohesiveness on…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Behavioral Objectives, Behavioral Science Research, Disclosure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stockton, Rex; And Others – Group and Organization Studies, 1979
Investigated the relationship between establishment of pregroup goals and postgroup assessment of progress toward goals. Participants were categorized by selection of goals, with interpersonal-relationship and self-confidence goals determining the category. The progress-toward-goal post-test revealed more progress on top-ranking goals than on…
Descriptors: Expectation, Goal Orientation, Group Unity, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zaccaro, Stephen J.; Lowe, Charles A. – Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
Presents a study designed to contrast the effects of task-based and interpersonal cohesiveness on group performance of students. Concludes that high task cohesion helped group performance, while interpersonal attraction had no apparent effect. Finding that increased interpersonal cohesion improved task commitment, the authors suggest that…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Wilson, Alicia A.; Stohl, Cynthia – 1989
A study examined the relationship between participation and performance in groups to determine whether increased communicative activity brought about through participation in groups resulted in the acquisition of specific types of organizational knowledge and increased motivation which positively affected performance. Subjects for the study were…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Group Membership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cota, Albert A.; And Others – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995
Reviews the literature on unidimensional and multidimensional models of cohesion and describes cohesion as a multidimensional construct with primary and secondary dimensions. Found that primary dimensions described the cohesiveness of all or most types of groups, whereas secondary dimensions only described the cohesiveness of specific types of…
Descriptors: Cohort Analysis, Cooperation, Group Unity, Groups
Hannikainen, Maritta; van Oers, Bert – 1999
The social and collective aspect in human activities has become one of the main issues in Vygotskian analyses of learning and development. The study assumed that this aspect presupposes some feeling of belonging together and having a shared commitment on the part of the participants. Asserting that relatively little attention has been given to…
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Cooperative Learning, Elementary School Students, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wallace, David S.; And Others – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995
Examined whether group members differ in the number of in-group subtype distinctions that they draw. Drawing on results of two studies, found that members of groups whose primary function is intragroup interaction (fraternities, sororities, athletic teams) draw more subtype distinctions within their own group than within other groups. (RJM)
Descriptors: Cohort Analysis, Congruence (Psychology), Group Unity, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zaccaro, Stephen J. – Journal of Social Psychology, 1991
Presents results of a study contrasting different forms of group cohesiveness in a student military organization. Reports that task cohesiveness was more strongly associated with lower role uncertainty, higher individual performance, and lower absenteeism than was interpersonal cohesiveness. Concludes that data provide evidence for a…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Group Unity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Yueh-Ting; Ottati, Victor – Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995
Considers two determinants--one cognitive and the other motivational--of perceptual fluctuations of in-group variation. Results indicate that when motivation to protect social or personal identity from threat is absent, priming the in-group social category promotes a homogeneous and cohesive view of the in-group. (RJM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cohort Analysis, Congruence (Psychology), Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mullen, Brian; And Others – Journal of Social Psychology, 1991
Summarizes research comparing boundaries around larger and smaller groups. Finds that the perception of group boundary permatbility varies with group size. Reports a greater perceived distinction between the group and the individual passerby as group size increases. Describes the effects of varying group member proximity. Discusses implications…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Correlation, Group Dynamics, Group Structure