Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 8 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
McNamara, Danielle S. | 3 |
Allen, Laura K. | 2 |
Snow, Erica L. | 2 |
Ahmed Ashraf | 1 |
Ahmed Magooda | 1 |
Andrew Williams | 1 |
Anthony Wallis | 1 |
Catherine Ward | 1 |
Clare L. Singh | 1 |
Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
Diane Litman | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 10 |
Journal Articles | 7 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Arizona (Phoenix) | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dirk H. R. Spennemann; Jessica Biles; Lachlan Brown; Matthew F. Ireland; Laura Longmore; Clare L. Singh; Anthony Wallis; Catherine Ward – Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2024
Purpose: The use of generative artificial intelligence (genAi) language models such as ChatGPT to write assignment text is well established. This paper aims to assess to what extent genAi can be used to obtain guidance on how to avoid detection when commissioning and submitting contract-written assignments and how workable the offered solutions…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education, Cheating
Andrew Williams – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024
The value of generative AI tools in higher education has received considerable attention. Although there are many proponents of its value as a learning tool, many are concerned with the issues regarding academic integrity and its use by students to compose written assessments. This study evaluates and compares the output of three commonly used…
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Artificial Intelligence, Writing Assignments, Biomedicine
Ahmed Magooda; Diane Litman; Ahmed Ashraf; Muhsin Menekse – Grantee Submission, 2022
Having students write reflections has been shown to help teachers improve their instruction and students improve their learning outcomes. With the aid of Natural Language Processing (NLP), real-time educational applications that can assess and provide feedback on reflection quality can be deployed. In this work, we first evaluate various NLP…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Assignments, Reflection, Natural Language Processing
Manik R. Reddy; Nils G. Walter; Yulia V. Sevryugina – Journal of Chemical Education, 2024
The effective and responsible educational application of ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools constitutes an active area of exploration. This study describes and assesses the implementation of a structured, GenAI-assisted scientific essay writing assignment in nucleic acid biochemistry. Briefly, students created,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Writing Assignments, Biochemistry
L. Hannah; E. E. Jang; M. Shah; V. Gupta – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2023
Machines have a long-demonstrated ability to find statistical relationships between qualities of texts and surface-level linguistic indicators of writing. More recently, unlocked by artificial intelligence, the potential of using machines to identify content-related writing trait criteria has been uncovered. This development is significant,…
Descriptors: Validity, Automation, Scoring, Writing Assignments
Nguyen, Huy; Xiong, Wenting; Litman, Diane – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
A peer-review system that automatically evaluates and provides formative feedback on free-text feedback comments of students was iteratively designed and evaluated in college and high-school classrooms. Classroom assignments required students to write paper drafts and submit them to a peer-review system. When student peers later submitted feedback…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing
Donnelly, Dermot F.; Vitale, Jonathan M.; Linn, Marcia C. – Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015
Middle school students struggle to explain thermodynamics concepts. In this study, to help students succeed, we use a natural language processing program to analyze their essays explaining the aspects of thermodynamics and provide guidance based on the automated score. The 346 sixth-grade students were assigned to either the critique condition…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Grade 6, Secondary School Science, Thermodynamics
Crossley, Scott A.; Varner, Laura K.; Roscoe, Rod D.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2013
We present an evaluation of the Writing Pal (W-Pal) intelligent tutoring system (ITS) and the W-Pal automated writing evaluation (AWE) system through the use of computational indices related to text cohesion. Sixty-four students participated in this study. Each student was assigned to either the W-Pal ITS condition or the W-Pal AWE condition. The…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Writing Assignments