NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Every Student Succeeds Act…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn; Christine Depies DeStefano; Christopher D. Charles; Mary Little – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
Randomized experiments are a strong design for establishing impact evidence because the random assignment mechanism theoretically allows confidence in attributing group differences to the intervention. Growth of randomized experiments within educational studies has been widely documented. However, randomized experiments within education have…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Problems, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weibel, Stephanie; Popp, Maria; Reis, Stefanie; Skoetz, Nicole; Garner, Paul; Sydenham, Emma – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Evidence synthesis findings depend on the assumption that the included studies follow good clinical practice and results are not fabricated or false. Studies which are problematic due to scientific misconduct, poor research practice, or honest error may distort evidence synthesis findings. Authors of evidence synthesis need transparent mechanisms…
Descriptors: Identification, Randomized Controlled Trials, Integrity, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wei Li; Yanli Xie; Dung Pham; Nianbo Dong; Jessaca Spybrook; Benjamin Kelcey – Asia Pacific Education Review, 2024
Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are commonly used to evaluate the causal effects of educational interventions, where the entire clusters (e.g., schools) are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions. This study introduces statistical methods for designing and analyzing two-level (e.g., students nested within schools) and three-level…
Descriptors: Research Design, Multivariate Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Hierarchical Linear Modeling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adam Sales; Ethan Prihar; Johann Gagnon-Bartsch; Neil Heffernan – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2023
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) give unbiased estimates of average effects. However, positive effects for the majority of students may mask harmful effects for smaller subgroups, and RCTs often have too small a sample to estimate these subgroup effects. In many RCTs, covariate and outcome data are drawn from a larger database. For…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Randomized Controlled Trials, Data Use, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sims, Sam; Anders, Jake; Inglis, Matthew; Lortie-Forgues, Hugues – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2023
Randomized controlled trials have proliferated in education, in part because they provide an unbiased estimator for the causal impact of interventions. It is increasingly recognized that many such trials in education have low power to detect an effect if indeed there is one. However, it is less well known that low powered trials tend to…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Research, Effect Size, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Charles Weijer – Research Ethics, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic touched off an unprecedented search for vaccines and treatments. Without question, the development of vaccines to prevent COVID-19 was an enormous scientific accomplishment. Further, the RECOVERY and Solidarity trials identified effective treatments for COVID-19. But all was not success. The urgent need for COVID-19…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Immunization Programs, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emma Law; Isabel Smith – Research Ethics, 2024
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the race to find an effective vaccine or treatment saw an 'extraordinary number' of clinical trials being conducted. While there were some key success stories, not all trials produced results that informed patient care. There was a significant amount of waste in clinical research during the pandemic which is said to…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Integrity, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simpson, Adrian – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2023
Evidence-based education aims to support policy makers choosing between potential interventions. This rarely involves considering each in isolation; instead, sets of evidence regarding many potential policy interventions are considered. Filtering a set on any quantity measured with error risks the "winner's curse": conditional on…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Educational Research, Evidence Based Practice, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulhall, Peter; Taggart, Laurence; McAloon, Toni; Coates, Vivien – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2021
Background: Globally, conducting randomised controlled trials can be a complex endeavour. The complexity increases when including participants with cognitive or intellectual disabilities. A fuller understanding of the barriers and challenges that can be expected in such trials may help researchers to make their trials more inclusive for people…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Adults, Intellectual Disability, Expertise
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelly Hallberg; Andrew Swanlund; Ryan Williams – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent public health response led to an unprecedented disruption in educational instruction in the U.S. and around the world. Many schools quickly moved to virtual learning for the bulk of the 2020 spring term and many states cancelled annual assessments of student learning. The 2020-21 school year…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Educational Research, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peng Ding; Luke W. Miratrix – Grantee Submission, 2019
For binary experimental data, we discuss randomization-based inferential procedures that do not need to invoke any modeling assumptions. We also introduce methods for likelihood and Bayesian inference based solely on the physical randomization without any hypothetical super population assumptions about the potential outcomes. These estimators have…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Statistical Inference, Randomized Controlled Trials, Bayesian Statistics
Spybrook, Jessaca; Zhang, Qi; Kelcey, Ben; Dong, Nianbo – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2020
Over the past 15 years, we have seen an increase in the use of cluster randomized trials (CRTs) to test the efficacy of educational interventions. These studies are often designed with the goal of determining whether a program works, or answering the what works question. Recently, the goals of these studies expanded to include for whom and under…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Research, Program Effectiveness, Intervention
Timothy Lycurgus; Ben B. Hansen; Mark White – Grantee Submission, 2022
We present an aggregation scheme that increases power in randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiments when the intervention possesses a robust and well-articulated theory of change. Intervention studies using longitudinal data often include multiple observations on individuals, some of which may be more likely to manifest a treatment effect…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Quasiexperimental Design, Intervention
Tipton, Elizabeth; Spybrook, Jessaca; Fitzgerald, Kaitlyn G.; Wang, Qian; Davidson, Caryn – Educational Researcher, 2021
As a result of the evidence-based decision-making movement, the number of randomized trials evaluating educational programs and curricula has increased dramatically over the past 20 years. Policy makers and practitioners are encouraged to use the results of these trials to inform their decision making in schools and school districts. At the same…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Research, Institutional Characteristics, Participant Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hasegawa, Raiden B.; Deshpande, Sameer K.; Small, Dylan S.; Rosenbaum, Paul R. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020
Causal effects are commonly defined as comparisons of the potential outcomes under treatment and control, but this definition is threatened by the possibility that either the treatment or the control condition is not well defined, existing instead in more than one version. This is often a real possibility in nonexperimental or observational…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Inferences, Randomized Controlled Trials, Experimental Groups
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2