Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Prior Learning | 2 |
| Sequential Learning | 2 |
| Test Format | 2 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Individual Testing | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| Learning Experience | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Butter, Eliot J. | 1 |
| Chao, Szu-Fu | 1 |
| Deane, Paul | 1 |
| Dreier, Kelsey | 1 |
| O'Reilly, Tenaha | 1 |
| Snyder, Frederick R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Matching Familiar Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full text
Direct linkDeane, Paul; O'Reilly, Tenaha; Chao, Szu-Fu; Dreier, Kelsey – Grantee Submission, 2018
The purpose of the report is to explore some of the mechanisms involved in the writing process. In particular, we examine students' process data (keystroke log analysis) to uncover how students approach a knowledge-telling task using 2 different task types. In the first task, students were asked to list as many words as possible related to a…
Descriptors: Writing Processes, Prior Learning, Task Analysis, High School Students
Peer reviewedButter, Eliot J.; Snyder, Frederick R. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Third grade children (n=24) who were administered the standard, simultaneous version of the Matching Familiar Figures test committed fewer errors when administered a sequential version of the same test than did subjects (n=24) who took the more difficult sequential version first. (PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Comparative Analysis, Individual Testing, Learning Experience
