Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Learning Modules | 3 |
Test Reliability | 3 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Alternative Assessment | 1 |
Calculus | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
College Mathematics | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Comparative Testing | 1 |
Creativity | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Alcock, Lara | 1 |
Bates, Simon P. | 1 |
Jones, Ian | 1 |
Noraini Abdullah | 1 |
Parthiban Govindasamy | 1 |
Schroeder, Marianne | 1 |
Therese M. Cumming | 1 |
Zumrawi, Abdel Azim | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Parthiban Govindasamy; Therese M. Cumming; Noraini Abdullah – Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2024
Despite the acknowledged importance of integrating creativity into school curricula, students with learning disabilities often lack the skill of creativity, due to its absence in classroom instruction. To address these gaps, the authors developed a needs analysis questionnaire assessing the necessity of a creativity module for primary school…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Test Reliability, Creativity, Learning Modules
Zumrawi, Abdel Azim; Bates, Simon P.; Schroeder, Marianne – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2014
This paper addresses the determination of statistically desirable response rates in students' surveys, with emphasis on assessing the effect of underlying variability in the student evaluation of teaching (SET). We discuss factors affecting the determination of adequate response rates and highlight challenges caused by non-response and lack of…
Descriptors: Inferences, Test Reliability, Response Rates (Questionnaires), Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Jones, Ian; Alcock, Lara – Studies in Higher Education, 2014
Peer assessment typically requires students to judge peers' work against assessment criteria. We tested an alternative approach in which students judged pairs of scripts against one another in the absence of assessment criteria. First year mathematics undergraduates (N?=?194) sat a written test on conceptual understanding of multivariable…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Alternative Assessment, Undergraduate Students