Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Annual Review of English… | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Language… | 1 |
| IRAL | 1 |
| Interactive Learning… | 1 |
| Language, Culture and… | 1 |
Author
| Calderón, Juan Felipe | 1 |
| Carmach, Ignacio | 1 |
| Crosthwaite, Peter | 1 |
| Díaz, Juan Jaime | 1 |
| Loucky, John Paul | 1 |
| Nussbaum, Miguel | 1 |
| Vespoor, Marjolijn | 1 |
| Villalta, Marco | 1 |
| Winitz, Harris | 1 |
| Yagi, Sane M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkCrosthwaite, Peter – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2017
An increasing number of studies have looked at the value of corpus-based data-driven learning (DDL) for second language (L2) written error correction, with generally positive results. However, a potential conundrum for language teachers involved in the process is how to provide feedback on students' written production for DDL. The study looks at…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Morphology (Languages), Syntax
Calderón, Juan Felipe; Nussbaum, Miguel; Carmach, Ignacio; Díaz, Juan Jaime; Villalta, Marco – Interactive Learning Environments, 2016
Language learning tools have evolved to take into consideration new teaching models of collaboration and communication. While second language acquisition tasks have been taken online, the traditional language laboratory has remained unchanged. By continuing to follow its original configuration based on individual work, the language laboratory…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Second Language Learning, Pronunciation, Second Language Instruction
Vespoor, Marjolijn; Winitz, Harris – IRAL, 1997
Evaluates the effectiveness of lexical-field instruction for intermediate level English-as-a-Second-Language students in a language laboratory setting. Findings reveal that the lexical-field instruction is an effective procedure for teaching general language knowledge through the meaning system. (45 references) (Author/CK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, Course Content, Dictionaries
Peer reviewedYagi, Sane M. – Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2000
Reports successful outcomes for a Teaching English as a Foreign Language module based on simultaneous oral translation from Arabic into English. Learners worked individually in a traditional language laboratory. Results show that simultaneous interpretation significantly improves learner performance and is an excellent tool for diagnosing learner…
Descriptors: Arabic, Cultural Differences, Cultural Influences, English (Second Language)
Download full textLoucky, John Paul – Annual Review of English Learning & Teaching, 1997
A study tested the English vocabulary and reading comprehension of about 1,500 Japanese college and university students and compared three different media formats for teaching vocabulary in English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) in a number of Japanese college classes: commercially available and teacher-adapted computer software; traditional…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Instruction, College Students, Comparative Analysis
