Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Notetaking | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Sentences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Litman, Diane | 1 |
| Zhang, Fan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textZhang, Fan; Litman, Diane – Grantee Submission, 2015
This paper explores the annotation and classification of students' revision behaviors in argumentative writing. A sentence-level revision schema is proposed to capture why and how students make revisions. Based on the proposed schema, a small corpus of student essays and revisions was annotated. Studies show that manual annotation is reliable with…
Descriptors: Notetaking, Classification, Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition)
