Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Accuracy | 2 |
Self Evaluation (Individuals) | 2 |
Task Analysis | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Feedback (Response) | 1 |
Metacognition | 1 |
Outcomes of Education | 1 |
Performance | 1 |
Problem Solving | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Metacognition and Learning | 2 |
Author
Baars, Martine | 1 |
List, Alexandra | 1 |
Paas, Fred | 1 |
Raaijmakers, Steven F. | 1 |
Wang, Ying | 1 |
van Gog, Tamara | 1 |
van Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wang, Ying; List, Alexandra – Metacognition and Learning, 2019
The literature on calibration suggests that students consider a multitude of factors when they self-evaluate task performance. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on calibration within a complex task environment, such as when students are asked to compose written responses based on multiple texts. In this study, we examined the criteria that…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Task Analysis, Performance
Raaijmakers, Steven F.; Baars, Martine; Paas, Fred; van Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G.; van Gog, Tamara – Metacognition and Learning, 2019
Effective self-regulated learning in settings in which students can decide what tasks to work on, requires accurate self-assessment (i.e., a judgment of own level of performance) as well as accurate task selection (i.e., choosing a subsequent task that fits the current level of performance). Because self-assessment accuracy is often low,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Accuracy, Metacognition, Self Evaluation (Individuals)