Descriptor
| Due Process | 2 |
| Legal Problems | 2 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Check Lists | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Discipline Problems | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Personnel… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedScriven, Michael – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1997
A detailed checklist and timeline for ensuring due process are provided for adverse personnel actions, and the need to supplement this with expert, same-jurisdiction legal advice is stressed. This approach emphasizes the importance of treating due process as an ethical as well as a legal requirement. (SLD)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Due Process
Download full textTauber, Robert T. – 1984
The issue of whether cheating and plagiarism should be categorized as an academic evaluation or disciplinary misconduct is discussed. It is claimed that if these offenses are categorized as disciplinary misconduct, students are entitled to some due process. However, if cheating and plagiarism are classified as academic evaluations, students are…
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Faculty, College Students
